TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjuvant interferon-α for the treatment of high-risk melanoma
T2 - An individual patient data meta-analysis
AU - on behalf of
AU - the International Melanoma Meta-Analysis Collaborative Group (IMMCG)
AU - Ives, Natalie J.
AU - Suciu, Stefan
AU - Eggermont, Alexander M.M.
AU - Kirkwood, John
AU - Lorigan, Paul
AU - Markovic, Svetomir N.
AU - Garbe, Claus
AU - Wheatley, Keith
AU - Bufalino, Rosaria
AU - Cameron, David
AU - Cascinelli, Natale
AU - Doherty, Valerie
AU - Garbe, Claus
AU - Gore, Martin
AU - Hancock, Barry
AU - Harrison, Rebecca
AU - Ives, Natalie
AU - Kirkwood, John
AU - Kressig, Michael
AU - Lee, Sandra
AU - Lorigan, Paul
AU - MacKie, Rona
AU - Markovic, Svetomir N.
AU - Marsden, Jerry
AU - Suciu, Stefan
AU - Suman, Vera
AU - Turner, Lesley
AU - Wheatley, Keith
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Background Many randomised trials assessing interferon-α (IFN-α) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanoma have been undertaken. To better assess the role of IFN-α, an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of these trials was undertaken. Methods IPD was sought from all randomised trials of adjuvant IFN-α versus no IFN-α for high-risk melanoma. Primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Standard methods for quantitative IPD meta-analysis were used. Subgroup analyses by dose, duration of treatment and various patient and disease-specific parameters were performed. Findings Fifteen trials were included in the analysis (eleven with IPD). EFS was significantly improved with IFN-α (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, CI 0.81–0.91; P < 0.00001), as was OS (HR = 0.90, CI 0.85–0.97; P = 0.003). The absolute differences in EFS at 5 and 10 years were 3.5% and 2.7%, and for OS were 3.0% and 2.8% respectively in favour of IFN-α. There was no evidence that the benefit of IFN-α differed depending on dose or duration of treatment, or by age, gender, site of primary tumour, disease stage, Breslow thickness, or presence of clinical nodes. Only for ulceration was there evidence of an interaction (test for heterogeneity: P = 0.04 for EFS; P = 0.002 for OS); only patients with ulcerated tumours appeared to obtain benefit from IFN-α. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides clear evidence that adjuvant IFN-α significantly reduces the risk of relapse and improves survival and shows no benefit for higher doses compared to lower doses. The increased benefit in patients with ulcerated tumours, and lack of benefit in patients without ulceration, needs further investigation.
AB - Background Many randomised trials assessing interferon-α (IFN-α) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanoma have been undertaken. To better assess the role of IFN-α, an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of these trials was undertaken. Methods IPD was sought from all randomised trials of adjuvant IFN-α versus no IFN-α for high-risk melanoma. Primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Standard methods for quantitative IPD meta-analysis were used. Subgroup analyses by dose, duration of treatment and various patient and disease-specific parameters were performed. Findings Fifteen trials were included in the analysis (eleven with IPD). EFS was significantly improved with IFN-α (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, CI 0.81–0.91; P < 0.00001), as was OS (HR = 0.90, CI 0.85–0.97; P = 0.003). The absolute differences in EFS at 5 and 10 years were 3.5% and 2.7%, and for OS were 3.0% and 2.8% respectively in favour of IFN-α. There was no evidence that the benefit of IFN-α differed depending on dose or duration of treatment, or by age, gender, site of primary tumour, disease stage, Breslow thickness, or presence of clinical nodes. Only for ulceration was there evidence of an interaction (test for heterogeneity: P = 0.04 for EFS; P = 0.002 for OS); only patients with ulcerated tumours appeared to obtain benefit from IFN-α. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides clear evidence that adjuvant IFN-α significantly reduces the risk of relapse and improves survival and shows no benefit for higher doses compared to lower doses. The increased benefit in patients with ulcerated tumours, and lack of benefit in patients without ulceration, needs further investigation.
KW - Adjuvant interferon
KW - Individual patient data meta-analysis
KW - Melanoma
KW - Randomised controlled trials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021715890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28692949
AN - SCOPUS:85021715890
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 82
SP - 171
EP - 183
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -