Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antifungal Use in Immunocompromised Children in Europe: A 12-Week Multicenter Weekly Point Prevalence Survey (CALYPSO)

  • Elisavet Chorafa
  • , Elias Iosifidis
  • , Andrea Oletto
  • , Adilia Warris
  • , Elio Castagnola
  • , Roger Bruggemann
  • , Andreas H. Groll
  • , Thomas Lehrnbecher
  • , Laura F. Antolin
  • , Alessio Mesini
  • , Aisha A. Alkhaaldi
  • , Fernando Baquero-Artigao
  • , Benhur S. Cetin
  • , Daniel Ebrahimi-Fakhari
  • , Marieke Emonts
  • , Susanna Esposito
  • , Valentina Fainardi
  • , Elisabetta Ghimenton-Walters
  • , Manuel Gijón
  • , Alba G. Guerrero
  • Carlos D. Grasa, Igne Kairiene, Kornelija Kildonaviciute, Maria Kourti, Angela Manzanares, Natalia Mendoza-Palomar, Maria Noni, Eugenia Papakonstantinou, Stéphane Paulus, Thomas Perwein, Jelena Rascon, Elena Rincón-López, Pere Soler-Palacin, Galina Solopova, Vassiliki Spoulou, Volker Strenger, Kara Tedford, Christina Tzika, Borbala Zsigmond, Emmanuel Roilides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We prospectively analyzed antifungal use in immunocompromised children through a multicenter 12-week weekly point-prevalence survey in 31 hematology-oncology (HO) and hematopoietic stem cell/solid organ transplant (HSCT/SOT) units of 18 hospitals in 11 European countries. All patients hospitalized and receiving systemic antifungals were included. Ward policies, and weekly ward/patient data were collected. All 21 HO and 10 HSCT/ SOT units had prophylaxis policies for high-risk patients (27/31 used azoles, 14/31 echinocandins and 15/31 liposomal amphotericin B [LAMB]). Among 572 courses recorded, prophylaxis was indicated in 439/572 (77%) and treatment in 133/572 (62/133 empirical, 43/133 pre-emptive, 28/133 targeted). Among patients receiving prophylaxis, 56% belonged to the non-high-risk group. Most common reasons for empirical, pre-emptive and targeted treatment were antibiotic-resistant febrile neutropenia (52%), abnormalities on chest-CT with/without positive galactomannan (77%) and candidiasis (82%), respectively. Fluconazole and LAMB were the most frequently prescribed agents both for prophylaxis (31%, 21%) and treatment (32%, 23%). Underdosing of micafungin for treatment in 50% of prescriptions and of fluconazole for treatment and prophylaxis in 70% of cases was noticed. In conclusion, most antifungal prescribing was for prophylaxis, with fluconazole being the main antifungal prescribed. Inadequate doses of antifungal prescribing and prophylaxis of non-high-risk patients could be targets for improvement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e222-e230
JournalJournal of pediatric hematology/oncology
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • antifungal agents
  • antifungal prescriptions
  • antifungal stewardship
  • antifungal use
  • immunocompromised patients
  • Prevalence
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Child, Preschool
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Mycoses/prevention & control
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Europe/epidemiology
  • Adolescent
  • Female
  • Immunocompromised Host
  • Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use
  • Child

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antifungal Use in Immunocompromised Children in Europe: A 12-Week Multicenter Weekly Point Prevalence Survey (CALYPSO)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this