Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units—the SAFE-ICU study

  • Jason A. Roberts
  • , Fekade B. Sime
  • , Jeffrey Lipman
  • , María Patricia Hernández-Mitre
  • , João Pedro Baptista
  • , Roger J. Brüggemann
  • , Jai Darvall
  • , Jan J. De Waele
  • , George Dimopoulos
  • , Jean Yves Lefrant
  • , Mohd Basri Mat Nor
  • , Jordi Rello
  • , Leonardo Seoane
  • , Monica A. Slavin
  • , Miia Valkonen
  • , Mario Venditti
  • , Giancarlo Ceccarelli
  • , Wai Tat Wong
  • , Markus Zeitlinger
  • , Claire Roger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Appropriate antifungal therapy is a major determinant of survival in critically ill patients with invasive fungal disease. We sought to describe whether contemporary dosing of antifungals achieves therapeutic exposures in critically ill patients. Methods: In a prospective, open-label, multicenter pharmacokinetic study, intensive care unit (ICU) patients prescribed azoles, echinocandins, or polyene antifungals for treatment or prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on two occasions, with three samples taken during a single dosing interval on each occasion. Total concentrations were centrally measured using validated chromatographic methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Antifungal dosing adequacy was assessed using predefined PK/PD targets. Results: We included 339 patients from 30 ICUs across 12 countries. Median age 62 (interquartile range [IQR], 51–70) years, median APACHE II score 22 (IQR, 17–28), and 61% males. Antifungal therapy was primarily prescribed for treatment (80.8%). Fluconazole was the most frequently prescribed antifungal (40.7%). The most common indication for treatment was intra-abdominal infection (30.7%). Fungi were identified in 45% of patients, of which only 26% had a minimum inhibitory concentration available. Target attainment was higher for patients receiving prophylaxis (> 80% for most drugs). For patients receiving treatment, low target attainment was noted for voriconazole (57.1%), posaconazole (63.2%), micafungin (64.1%) and amphotericin B (41.7%). Conclusion: This study highlights the varying degrees of target attainment across antifungal agents in critically ill patients. While a significant proportion of patients achieved the predefined PK/PD targets, wide variability and subtherapeutic exposures persist. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03136926, 2017-04-21.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-317
Number of pages16
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antifungals
  • Critically ill
  • Intensive care unit
  • Invasive fungal disease
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Critical Illness/therapy
  • Echinocandins/pharmacokinetics
  • Antifungal Agents/pharmacokinetics
  • Intensive Care Units/organization & administration
  • Azoles/pharmacokinetics
  • Female
  • Aged

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are contemporary antifungal doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Outcomes from an international, multicenter pharmacokinetics study for Screening Antifungal Exposure in Intensive Care Units—the SAFE-ICU study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this