Corrigendum to “Cost-effectiveness analysis in melanoma detection: A transition model applied to dermoscopy” [Eur J Cancer 67 (2016) 38–45] (S0959804916323450) (10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.020))

Isabelle Tromme, Catherine Legrand, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Ulrike Leiter, Stefan Suciu, Alexander Eggermont, Laurine Sacré, Jean François Baurain, Luc Thomas, Philippe Beutels, Niko Speybroeck

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret that there was an error in section 3.3 of the original paper. The first sentence in section 3.3 should read as follows, ending with group B (not group A as given in the original). 3.3. CEA planes Our PSA led to an average decrease in cost of 4420€ (95% credibility interval [CI]: 5821, 2972) and an average increase in QALY of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.99, 2.07) in favour of group B. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247
Number of pages1
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume82
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Cost-effectiveness analysis in melanoma detection: A transition model applied to dermoscopy” [Eur J Cancer 67 (2016) 38–45] (S0959804916323450) (10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.020))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this