Corrigendum to “Cost-effectiveness analysis in melanoma detection: A transition model applied to dermoscopy” [Eur J Cancer 67 (2016) 38–45] (S0959804916323450) (10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.020))

The authors regret that there was an error in section 3.3 of the original paper. The first sentence in section 3.3 should read as follows, ending with group B (not group A as given in the original). 3.3. CEA planes Our PSA led to an average decrease in cost of 4420€ (95% credibility interval [CI]: 5821, 2972) and an average increase in QALY of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.99, 2.07) in favour of group B. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.