Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 258 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Nature |
Volume | 502 |
Issue number | 7470 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Access to Document
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Nature, Vol. 502, No. 7470, 2013, p. 258.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer (Nature (2013) 500 (415-421) DOI:10.1038/nature12477)
AU - Alexandrov, Ludmil B.
AU - Nik-Zainal, Serena
AU - Wedge, David C.
AU - Aparicio, Samuel A.J.R.
AU - Behjati, Sam
AU - Biankin, Andrew V.
AU - Bignell, Graham R.
AU - Bolli, Niccolò
AU - Borg, Ake
AU - Børresen-Dale, Anne Lise
AU - Boyault, Sandrine
AU - Burkhardt, Birgit
AU - Butler, Adam P.
AU - Caldas, Carlos
AU - Davies, Helen R.
AU - Desmedt, Christine
AU - Eils, Roland
AU - Eyfjörd, Jórunn Erla
AU - Foekens, John A.
AU - Greaves, Mel
AU - Hosoda, Fumie
AU - Hutter, Barbara
AU - Ilicic, Tomislav
AU - Imbeaud, Sandrine
AU - Imielinski, Marcin
AU - Jäger, Natalie
AU - Jones, David T.W.
AU - Knappskog, Stian
AU - Kool, Marcel
AU - Lakhani, Sunil R.
AU - López-Otín, Carlos
AU - Martin, Sancha
AU - Munshi, Nikhil C.
AU - Nakamura, Hiromi
AU - Northcott, Paul A.
AU - Pajic, Marina
AU - Papaemmanuil, Elli
AU - Paradiso, Angelo
AU - Pearson, John V.
AU - Puente, Xose S.
AU - Raine, Keiran
AU - Ramakrishna, Manasa
AU - Richardson, Andrea L.
AU - Richter, Julia
AU - Rosenstiel, Philip
AU - Schlesner, Matthias
AU - Schumacher, Ton N.
AU - Span, Paul N.
AU - Teague, Jon W.
AU - Totoki, Yasushi
AU - Tutt, Andrew N.J.
AU - Valdés-Mas, Rafael
AU - Van Buuren, Marit M.
AU - Van 'T Veer, Laura
AU - Vincent-Salomon, Anne
AU - Waddell, Nicola
AU - Yates, Lucy R.
AU - Zucman-Rossi, Jessica
AU - Futreal, P. Andrew
AU - McDermott, Ultan
AU - Lichter, Peter
AU - Meyerson, Matthew
AU - Grimmond, Sean M.
AU - Siebert, Reiner
AU - Campo, Elías
AU - Shibata, Tatsuhiro
AU - Pfister, Stefan M.
AU - Campbell, Peter J.
AU - Stratton, Michael R.
N1 - Funding Information: © 2020 Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl. Individuals and nonprofit institutions may reproduce and distribute copies of this Article in any format at or below cost, for educational purposes, so long as each copy identifies the author, provides a citation to the Notre Dame Law Review, and includes this provision in the copyright notice. * Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development and Rita Anne Rollins Professor of Law, William & Mary Law School. I gratefully acknowledge the Plumeri Award for Faculty Excellence that supported this research. For helpful comments on prior drafts, I thank J. Maria Glover, Tara Grove, Benjamin Johnson, Richard Re, Joan Steinman, Stephen Wasby, Stephen Yelderman, the audience at the Civil Procedure Workshop hosted by the University of Texas, and the Remedies Discussion Group at the SEALS Annual Meeting. I thank Paul Hellyer for locating court filings and old treatises. I thank Ariana Cheng, Stephanie Cone, Lindsey Folcik, Damian Gallagher, Andrew Hufford, and Mason Shefa for research assistance. Funding Information: supported by a recent administrative directive); Bryan v. Austin, 354 U.S. 933, 933 (1957) (per curiam). 160 See United Mine Workers of Am. v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725 (1966) (defining the boundaries of an Article III case in terms of claims arising from a “common nucleus of operative fact”). 161 Supra notes 137–42 and accompanying text. Funding Information: GVR’ing in light of a confession of error is also supported by unquestioned practices in adjacent domains. Everyone seems to accept that an appellate court may vacate and remand for consideration of mootness without affirmatively finding that a case is moot.324 Further, part of the reason an appellate court vacates a decision when a case becomes moot on appeal— namely that the mootness prevents the appellate process from running its course and thereby leaves a potentially erroneous decision in place325—militates in favor of wiping out and redoing a judgment that even the winning party now concedes was flawed.326
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885660476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/nature12666
DO - 10.1038/nature12666
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:84885660476
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 502
SP - 258
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 7470
ER -