TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring weaning-related shock
T2 - Cardiac injury and overload, platelet-endothelial cell activation, and inflammatory response markers following ECMO decannulation
AU - Pladet, Lara C.A.
AU - Elzo Kraemer, Carlos V.
AU - Nierkens, Stefan
AU - Hermens, Jeannine A.
AU - Rademaker, Emma
AU - Derde, Lennie P.G.
AU - Meuwese, Christiaan L.
AU - Donker, Dirk W.
AU - Cremer, Olaf L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - IntroductionMortality in patients receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is partly attributable to unanticipated hemodynamic instability after elective decannulation, termed weaning-related shock (WRS). This study explored the etiology of WRS by analyzing sequential plasma biomarker profiles.MethodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort (2011–2022) of consecutive patients weaned from veno-arterial (V-A) or veno-venous (V-V) ECMO to evaluate WRS occurrence. WRS was defined as a rise in Vasoactive Inotropic Score ≥15 points for >6 h with a positive fluid balance and lactate >2 mmol/L within 72 h post-decannulation. Shock etiology was adjudicated as hemorrhagic, cardiogenic, septic, or unclassifiable. Subsequently, key plasma biomarkers reflecting inflammation, platelet-endothelial cell activation, and cardiac injury and overload were assessed pre- and post-decannulation, stratified on WRS occurrence, apparent etiology, and ECMO mode.ResultsOut of 97 eligible individuals, 88 (91%) were analyzed (70 V-A and 18 V-V). Among them, 24 (27%) patients developed WRS, all of whom had received V-A ECMO. WRS was attributed to hemorrhagic, cardiogenic, septic, or unclassifiable causes in 0, 8, 8 and 8 cases, respectively. No differences were observed between groups in markers of inflammation or platelet-endothelial cell activation, nor in their trajectories over time. Conversely, NT-proBNP levels, but not HsTnI, increased significantly after decannulation in WRS patients compared to V-V or V-A ECMO patients without WRS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). NT-proBNP was also higher in these subjects prior to decannulation (all p < 0.001).ConclusionBiomarker responses following ECMO decannulation suggest cardiac overload as the primary driver of WRS, irrespective of clinical shock diagnosis.
AB - IntroductionMortality in patients receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is partly attributable to unanticipated hemodynamic instability after elective decannulation, termed weaning-related shock (WRS). This study explored the etiology of WRS by analyzing sequential plasma biomarker profiles.MethodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort (2011–2022) of consecutive patients weaned from veno-arterial (V-A) or veno-venous (V-V) ECMO to evaluate WRS occurrence. WRS was defined as a rise in Vasoactive Inotropic Score ≥15 points for >6 h with a positive fluid balance and lactate >2 mmol/L within 72 h post-decannulation. Shock etiology was adjudicated as hemorrhagic, cardiogenic, septic, or unclassifiable. Subsequently, key plasma biomarkers reflecting inflammation, platelet-endothelial cell activation, and cardiac injury and overload were assessed pre- and post-decannulation, stratified on WRS occurrence, apparent etiology, and ECMO mode.ResultsOut of 97 eligible individuals, 88 (91%) were analyzed (70 V-A and 18 V-V). Among them, 24 (27%) patients developed WRS, all of whom had received V-A ECMO. WRS was attributed to hemorrhagic, cardiogenic, septic, or unclassifiable causes in 0, 8, 8 and 8 cases, respectively. No differences were observed between groups in markers of inflammation or platelet-endothelial cell activation, nor in their trajectories over time. Conversely, NT-proBNP levels, but not HsTnI, increased significantly after decannulation in WRS patients compared to V-V or V-A ECMO patients without WRS (p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). NT-proBNP was also higher in these subjects prior to decannulation (all p < 0.001).ConclusionBiomarker responses following ECMO decannulation suggest cardiac overload as the primary driver of WRS, irrespective of clinical shock diagnosis.
KW - cardiac overload
KW - extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
KW - inflammation
KW - platelet-endothelial cell activation
KW - weaning
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034842079
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fccc7153-a90b-3415-b97d-a725b645933b/
U2 - 10.1177/02676591261439583
DO - 10.1177/02676591261439583
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105034842079
SN - 0267-6591
JO - Perfusion (United Kingdom)
JF - Perfusion (United Kingdom)
ER -