Genoombreed onderzoek in de spreekkamer

Translated title of the contribution: Unsolicited genomic findings in daily clinical practice
  • Roel H.P. Wouters
  • , Rhodé M. Bijlsma
  • , Emile E. Voest
  • , Annelien L. Bredenoord

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly being used in clinical practice. As a result, various healthcare professionals now encounter ethical dilemmas that were formerly confined within the genetics clinic. In addition to autonomy and well-being of both patients and their family members, which need to be balanced carefully, a societal perspective is also vital to ensure the ethically sound introduction of whole genome sequencing into daily practice. Important choices to be made are: who is eligible for whole genome sequencing; how can informed consent be sensibly obtained, when dealing with such vast quantities of genomic information; which type of information should be offered to patients; should professionals actively search for pathogenic mutations. The rise of WGS has an impact on the moral responsibilities incumbent on healthcare professionals and necessitates a comprehensive societal debate on the advent of personalized medicine.

Translated title of the contributionUnsolicited genomic findings in daily clinical practice
Original languageDutch
JournalNederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Volume162
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unsolicited genomic findings in daily clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this