How much asparaginase is needed for optimal outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review focuses on asparaginase, a key component of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) treatment since the 1970s. This review evaluates how much asparaginase is needed for optimal outcome in childhood ALL. We provide an overview of asparaginase dose intensity, i.e. duration of total cumulative exposure in weeks and level of exposure reflected by dose and/or asparaginase activity level, and the corresponding outcome. We systematically searched papers published between January 1990 and March 2021 in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases and included 20 papers. The level and duration of exposure were based on the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug and the assumption that trough asparaginase activity levels of ≥100 IU/L should be achieved for complete L-asparagine depletion. The statistical meta-analysis of outcomes was not performed because different outcome measures were used. The level of exposure was not associated with the outcome as long as therapeutic asparaginase activity levels of ≥100 IU/L were reached. Conflicting results were found in the randomised controlled trials, but all truncation studies showed that the duration of exposure (expressed as weeks of L-asparagine depletion) does affect the outcome; however, no clear cutoff for optimal exposure duration was determined. Optimal exposure duration will also depend on immunophenotype, (cyto)genetic subgroups, risk group stratification and backbone therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-249
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume157
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
  • Asparaginase
  • Dose intensity
  • Outcome
  • Pediatric ALL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How much asparaginase is needed for optimal outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia? A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this