TY - JOUR
T1 - Hypersensitivity to Pegylated E.coli sparaginase as first-line treatment in contemporary paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia protocols
T2 - a meta-analysis of the Ponte di Legno Toxicity working group
AU - Ponte di Legno Toxicity Working Group
AU - Brigitha, Leiah J.
AU - Fiocco, Marta
AU - Pieters, Rob
AU - Albertsen, Birgitte K.
AU - Escherich, Gabriele
AU - Lopez-Lopez, Elixabet
AU - Mondelaers, Veerle
AU - Vora, Ajay
AU - Vrooman, Lynda
AU - Schmiegelow, Kjeld
AU - van der Sluis, Inge M.
N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Background: Hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase challenge its use and occur frequently (30–75%) after native Escherichia Coli (E.coli) asparaginase. Comparison of incidence of allergic reactions to pegylated E.coli asparaginase (PEGasparaginase) across contemporary paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) protocols is lacking. Method and patients: Questionnaires were sent to all members of the international ALL Ponte di Legno Toxicity Working Group. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the incidence of three types of hypersensitivity (allergy, allergic-like reaction and silent inactivation). Information on protocol level regarding PEGasparaginase dosing regimen, administration route and use of therapeutic drug monitoring was collected for risk analysis. Results: Newly diagnosed patients with ALL (n = 5880), aged 1–24 years old, were enrolled in seven different upfront ALL protocols using PEGasparaginase as first-line treatment. The incidence of allergic reactions (sum of allergies and allergic-like reactions) [95% confidence interval] was 2% [1%; 3%] during induction and 8% [5%; 11%] during postinduction. Route of administration, number of doses, dosage and number of PEGasparaginase-free weeks did not significantly influence risk of hypersensitivity. Multivariate meta-regression analysis suggests that initiation of PEGasparaginase in postinduction and higher number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals increased the risk for allergic reactions. 9–16% and 23–29% of all hypersensitivities were allergic-like reactions and silent inactivation, respectively. Conclusion: The incidence of allergic reactions is lower in protocols using PEGasparaginase as first-line treatment compared with that reported for E.coli asparaginase or PEGasparaginase after E.coli asparaginase. Postinduction phase, a higher number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals, and initiation of PEGasparaginase in postinduction phase are risk factors for allergic reactions. These results are important for planning of PEGasparaginase administrations in future frontline therapy.
AB - Background: Hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase challenge its use and occur frequently (30–75%) after native Escherichia Coli (E.coli) asparaginase. Comparison of incidence of allergic reactions to pegylated E.coli asparaginase (PEGasparaginase) across contemporary paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) protocols is lacking. Method and patients: Questionnaires were sent to all members of the international ALL Ponte di Legno Toxicity Working Group. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the incidence of three types of hypersensitivity (allergy, allergic-like reaction and silent inactivation). Information on protocol level regarding PEGasparaginase dosing regimen, administration route and use of therapeutic drug monitoring was collected for risk analysis. Results: Newly diagnosed patients with ALL (n = 5880), aged 1–24 years old, were enrolled in seven different upfront ALL protocols using PEGasparaginase as first-line treatment. The incidence of allergic reactions (sum of allergies and allergic-like reactions) [95% confidence interval] was 2% [1%; 3%] during induction and 8% [5%; 11%] during postinduction. Route of administration, number of doses, dosage and number of PEGasparaginase-free weeks did not significantly influence risk of hypersensitivity. Multivariate meta-regression analysis suggests that initiation of PEGasparaginase in postinduction and higher number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals increased the risk for allergic reactions. 9–16% and 23–29% of all hypersensitivities were allergic-like reactions and silent inactivation, respectively. Conclusion: The incidence of allergic reactions is lower in protocols using PEGasparaginase as first-line treatment compared with that reported for E.coli asparaginase or PEGasparaginase after E.coli asparaginase. Postinduction phase, a higher number of PEGasparaginase-free intervals, and initiation of PEGasparaginase in postinduction phase are risk factors for allergic reactions. These results are important for planning of PEGasparaginase administrations in future frontline therapy.
KW - Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
KW - Hypersensitivity
KW - Paediatric ALL
KW - PEGasparaginase
KW - Risk factors
KW - Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/complications
KW - Meta-Analysis as Topic
KW - Pons
KW - Polyethylene Glycols
KW - Humans
KW - Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology
KW - Hypersensitivity/complications
KW - Infant
KW - Young Adult
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Child
KW - Asparaginase/adverse effects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122431914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 34954438
AN - SCOPUS:85122431914
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 162
SP - 65
EP - 75
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -