Abstract
Here we show that Doxil® has minimal antitumour activity in the isolated limb perfusion (ILP) setting and its activity was not enhanced by the addition of tumour necrosis factor (TNF). Doxil® accumulation in tumour tissue was low and also not augmented by TNF. In contrast, activity of free conventional doxorubicin was enhanced by TNF. We conclude that application of Doxil® in a TNF-based ILP is not a useful alternative to free conventional doxorubicin or melphalan.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1830-1832 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | British journal of cancer |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Doxil®
- Isolated limb perfusion
- Rat
- Sarcoma
- Tumour necrosis factor-alpha
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lack of efficacy of Doxil® in TNF-α-based isolated limb perfusion in sarcoma-bearing rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver