Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimizing the outcome of surgery in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases

  • A. E. Van Der Pool
  • , J. H. De Wilt
  • , Z. S. Lalmahomed
  • , A. M. Eggermont
  • , J. N. Ijzermans
  • , C. Verhoef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the outcome of patients treated tor rectal cancer and synchronous hepatic metastases in the era of effective induction radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods: All patients undergoing surgical treatment of rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases between 2000 and 2007 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected database. Three approaches were followed: the classical staged, the simultaneous and the liver-first approach. Results: Of 57 patients identified, the primary tumour was resected first in 29 patients (group 1), simultaneous resection was performed in eight patients (group 2), and 20 patients underwent a liver-first approach (group 3). The overall morbidity rate was 24-6 per cent; there was no in-hospital mortality. Median in-hospital stay was significantly shorter for the simultaneous approach (9 days versus 18 and 15 days for groups 1 and 3 respectively; P < 0.001). The overall S-year survival rate was 38 per cent, with an estimated median survival of 47 months. Conclusion: Long-term survival can be achieved using an individualized approach, with curative intent, in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. Simultaneous resections as well as the liver-first approach are attractive alternatives to traditional staged resections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-390
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume97
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing the outcome of surgery in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this