Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient acceptable symptom states after total hip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up

  • J. C. Keurentjes
  • , F. R. Van Tol
  • , M. Fiocco
  • , C. So-Osman
  • , R. Onstenk
  • , A. W.M.M. Koopman-Van Gemert
  • , R. G. Pöll
  • , R. G.H.H. Nelissen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term follow-up. Methods: In a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation question assessing the patient's willingness to undergo surgery again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR) and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR). Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified a PASS threshold of 42 for the OHS after THR and 37 for the OKS after TKR. THR patients with an OHS ≥ 42 and TKR patients with an OKS ≥ 37 had a higher NRS for satisfaction and a greater likelihood of being willing to undergo surgery again. Conclusions: PASS thresholds appear larger at mid-term follow-up than at six months after surgery. Without external validation, we would advise against using these PASS thresholds as absolute thresholds in defining whether or not a patient has attained an acceptable symptom state after THR or TKR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-13
Number of pages7
JournalBone and Joint Research
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health-related quality of life
  • PROMs
  • Patient Acceptable Symptom State
  • Patient reported outcome measures
  • THR
  • TKR
  • Total hip replacement
  • Total knee replacement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient acceptable symptom states after total hip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this