Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phase I/II Study of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and Irinotecan in Children and Young Adults with Recurrent/Refractory Malignancies: Arm D of the AcSé-ESMART Trial

  • Susanne A. Gatz
  • , Pablo Berlanga
  • , Gwénaël Le Teuff
  • , Ivan Valiev
  • , Amaury Leruste
  • , Nicolas André
  • , Dominique Bluteau
  • , Nadege Corradini
  • , Jonathan Rubino
  • , Fabienne Thomas
  • , Souad Nebchi
  • , Eleni Karamouza
  • , Jeanne Petit
  • , Estelle Thebaud
  • , Alba Rubio-San-Simón
  • , Natasha K.A. van Eijkelenburg
  • , Lynley V. Marshall
  • , Sandra Raimbault
  • , Adela Canete
  • , Stephane Ducassou
  • Guy Makin, Michela Casanova, Emilie De Carli, Arnaud Petit, Melis Cardon, Ludovic Lacroix, Gaelle Pierron, Gudrun Schleiermacher, Michael J.F. Hubank, Aroa Soriano Fernandez, Karin P.S. Langenberg, David Castel, Tiphaine Adam de Beaumais, Xavier Paoletti, Pradeep B. Lukka, Richard Baldry, Peter G.S. Mortimer, Sergey I. Nikolaev, Birgit Geoerger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Arm D of the AcSé-ESMART proof-of-concept phase I/II platform trial aimed to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, activity, and biomarkers of the PARP inhibitor olaparib with irinotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory malignancies. Patients and Methods: Olaparib was administered orally twice daily on days 1 to 10 and irinotecan intravenously on days 4 to 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation followed the continuous reassessment method; activity was assessed in diverse tumor types (cohort 1) and Ewing sarcoma (cohort 2) according to a minimax Simon 2-stage design. Cohorts were enriched for alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathways. Results: Seventy patients (median age, 14.9 years; range, 5.0– 23.8) were included, 34 with diverse tumor types (25 with HRR gene alterations) and 36 with Ewing sarcoma. Sixty-six patients received 348 treatment cycles (median, 2; range, 1–51) over four dose levels. Main toxicities were gastrointestinal and myelosuppression; the RP2D was olaparib 90 mg/m2 twice daily and irinotecan 20 mg/m2/day. Olaparib exposure in children was equivalent to that in adults. The overall response rate was 9.1% (cohort 1, 11.8%; cohort 2, 6.3%). Four patients with osteosarcoma, pineoblastoma, choroid plexus carcinoma, and neuroblastoma experienced a partial response and were treated for nine to 51 cycles. Two patients with Ewing sarcoma experienced a complete and a partial response for 10 and 42 cycles, respectively. Genetic analyses suggest a high aneuploidy score possibly associated with objective response and prolonged stable disease. Conclusions: Olaparib combined with irinotecan demonstrated activity in pediatric tumors, which was enriched among tumors that exhibited aneuploidy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1210-1223
Number of pages14
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2026

Keywords

  • Phthalazines/administration & dosage
  • Humans
  • Child, Preschool
  • Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Male
  • Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/administration & dosage
  • Young Adult
  • Maximum Tolerated Dose
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
  • Adolescent
  • Female
  • Adult
  • Irinotecan/administration & dosage
  • Child
  • Piperazines/administration & dosage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase I/II Study of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and Irinotecan in Children and Young Adults with Recurrent/Refractory Malignancies: Arm D of the AcSé-ESMART Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this