Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients: A study by the EORTC-PAMM-NDDG

  • Markus Joerger
  • , Alwin D.R. Huitema
  • , Dick J. Richel
  • , Christian Dittrich
  • , Nikolas Pavlidis
  • , Evangelos Briasoulis
  • , Jan B. Vermorken
  • , Elena Strocchi
  • , Andrea Martoni
  • , Roberto Sorio
  • , Henk P. Sleeboom
  • , Miguel A. Izquierdo
  • , Duncan I. Jodrell
  • , Régine Féty
  • , Ernst De Bruijn
  • , Georg Hempel
  • , Mats Karlsson
  • , Brigitte Tranchand
  • , Ad H.G.J. Schrijvers
  • , Chris Twelves
  • Jos H. Beijnen, Jan H.M. Schellens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients. Patients and methods: Sixty-five female patients with early or advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 over 15 minutes followed by cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 over 15 minutes. The plasma concentration-time data of both drugs were measured, and the relationship between drug pharmacokinetics and neutrophil counts was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling. Relationships were explored between drug exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]), toxicity and tumour response. Results: Fifty-nine patients had complete pharmacokinetic and toxicity data. In 50 patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 60%, with complete responses in 6% of patients. Both doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics were associated with neutrophil toxicity. Cyclophosphamide exposure (the AUC) was significantly higher in patients with at least stable disease (n = 44) than in patients with progressive disease (n = 6; 945 μmol·h/L [95% CI 889, 1001] vs 602 μmol·h/L [95% CI 379, 825], p = 0.0002). No such correlation was found for doxorubicin. Body surface area was positively correlated with doxorubicin clearance; AST and patient age were negatively correlated with doxorubicin clearance; creatinine clearance was positively correlated with doxorubicinol clearance; and occasional concurrent use of carbamazepine was positively correlated with cyclophosphamide clearance. Conclusions: The proposed inhibitory population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model adequately described individual neutrophil counts after administration of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. In this patient population, exposure to cyclophosphamide, as assessed by the AUC, might have been a predictor of the treatment response, whereas exposure to doxorubicin was not. A prospective study should validate cyclophosphamide exposure as a predictive marker for the treatment response and clinical outcome in this patient group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1051-1068
Number of pages18
JournalClinical Pharmacokinetics
Volume46
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Cyclophosphamide, pharmacokinetics
  • Doxorubicin, pharmacokinetics
  • Pharmacokinetic modelling
  • Population pharmacokinetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients: A study by the EORTC-PAMM-NDDG'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this