TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic significance of chromosomal abnormalities at relapse in children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia
T2 - A retrospective cohort study of the Relapsed AML 2001/01 Study
AU - Klein, Kim
AU - Beverloo, H. Berna
AU - Zimmermann, Martin
AU - Raimondi, Susana C.
AU - von Neuhoff, Christine
AU - de Haas, Valérie
AU - van Weelderen, Romy
AU - Cloos, Jacqueline
AU - Abrahamsson, Jonas
AU - Bertrand, Yves
AU - Dworzak, Michael
AU - Fynn, Alcira
AU - Gibson, Brenda
AU - Ha, Shau Yin
AU - Harrison, Christine J.
AU - Hasle, Henrik
AU - Elitzur, Sarah
AU - Leverger, Guy
AU - Maschan, Alexei
AU - Razzouk, Bassem
AU - Reinhardt, Dirk
AU - Rizzari, Carmelo
AU - Smisek, Pter
AU - Creutzig, Ursula
AU - Kaspers, Gertjan J.L.
N1 - © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: In addition to treatment response, cytogenetic and molecular aberrations are the most important prognostic factors in children with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, little is known about cytogenetics at the time of relapse. Methods: This international study analyzed the prognostic value of cytogenetic profiles and karyotypic changes in pediatric relapsed AML in relation to the probability of event-free (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS). For this purpose, cytogenetic reports from all patients registered on the Relapsed AML 2001/01 Study were reviewed and classified. Results: Cytogenetic information at relapse was available for 403 (71%) of 569 registered patients. Frequently detected aberrations at relapse were t(8;21)(q22;q22) (n = 60) and inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) (n = 24), both associated with relatively good outcome (4-year pOS 59% and 71%, respectively). Monosomy 7/7q−, t(9;11)(p22;q23), t(10;11)(p12;q23), and complex karyotypes were associated with poor outcomes (4-year pOS 17%, 19%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). Of 261 (65%) patients for whom cytogenetic data were reliable at both diagnosis and relapse, pEFS was inferior for patients with karyotypic instability (n = 128, 49%), but pOS was similar. Unstable karyotypes with both gain and loss of aberrations were associated with inferior outcome. Early treatment response, time to relapse, and cytogenetic profile at time of relapse were the most important prognostic factors, both outweighing karytoypic instability per se. Conclusion: The cytogenetic subgroup at relapse is an independent risk factor for (event-free) survival. Cytogenetic assessment at the time of relapse is of high importance and may contribute to improved risk-adapted treatment for children with relapsed AML.
AB - Background: In addition to treatment response, cytogenetic and molecular aberrations are the most important prognostic factors in children with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, little is known about cytogenetics at the time of relapse. Methods: This international study analyzed the prognostic value of cytogenetic profiles and karyotypic changes in pediatric relapsed AML in relation to the probability of event-free (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS). For this purpose, cytogenetic reports from all patients registered on the Relapsed AML 2001/01 Study were reviewed and classified. Results: Cytogenetic information at relapse was available for 403 (71%) of 569 registered patients. Frequently detected aberrations at relapse were t(8;21)(q22;q22) (n = 60) and inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) (n = 24), both associated with relatively good outcome (4-year pOS 59% and 71%, respectively). Monosomy 7/7q−, t(9;11)(p22;q23), t(10;11)(p12;q23), and complex karyotypes were associated with poor outcomes (4-year pOS 17%, 19%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). Of 261 (65%) patients for whom cytogenetic data were reliable at both diagnosis and relapse, pEFS was inferior for patients with karyotypic instability (n = 128, 49%), but pOS was similar. Unstable karyotypes with both gain and loss of aberrations were associated with inferior outcome. Early treatment response, time to relapse, and cytogenetic profile at time of relapse were the most important prognostic factors, both outweighing karytoypic instability per se. Conclusion: The cytogenetic subgroup at relapse is an independent risk factor for (event-free) survival. Cytogenetic assessment at the time of relapse is of high importance and may contribute to improved risk-adapted treatment for children with relapsed AML.
KW - chromosomal instability
KW - clonal evolution
KW - core-binding factor leukemia
KW - cytogenetics
KW - karyotypic change(s)
KW - pediatric acute myeloid leukemia/pediatric AML
KW - relapsed AML
KW - Recurrence
KW - Prognosis
KW - Humans
KW - Chromosome Aberrations
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics
KW - Child
KW - Cohort Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115111547&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pbc.29341
DO - 10.1002/pbc.29341
M3 - Article
C2 - 34532968
AN - SCOPUS:85115111547
SN - 1545-5009
VL - 69
SP - e29341
JO - Pediatric Blood and Cancer
JF - Pediatric Blood and Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - e29341
ER -