TY - CHAP
T1 - Public Engagement at Research Institutes in the Netherlands
T2 - Fertile Territory or Terra Nullius?
AU - Russo, Pedro
AU - Bergsvik, Robert
AU - Cramer, Julia
AU - Kerkhoven, Anne
AU - Van Den Oever, Selina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 selection and editorial matter, Marta Entradas and Martin W. Bauer; individual chapters, the contributors.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - The Netherlands has more than seven decades of specific policies and programmes in science communication. Since the 1950s, public communication of science and technology has been the main strategy of the Dutch government for bridging gaps between science and society. In the Dutch research landscape, there are different stakeholders involved in public engagement with science activities, such as science museums, media, not-for-profit organisations and universities. For this study, we focused on public engagement activities at the research institute (RI) level. We surveyed 821 institutes and, based on a response rate of 14.3%, the data suggest that the Dutch RIs host an active and fertile research community in terms of public communication of science. This study also provides evidence that RIs with specific public engagement plans perform better than RIs without them. However, this study also highlights large differences between the science communication policy setting in the Dutch Research Agenda and policy implementation at RI levels and indicates a need for a clarification in terms coordination and responsibility for institutional public engagement implementation.
AB - The Netherlands has more than seven decades of specific policies and programmes in science communication. Since the 1950s, public communication of science and technology has been the main strategy of the Dutch government for bridging gaps between science and society. In the Dutch research landscape, there are different stakeholders involved in public engagement with science activities, such as science museums, media, not-for-profit organisations and universities. For this study, we focused on public engagement activities at the research institute (RI) level. We surveyed 821 institutes and, based on a response rate of 14.3%, the data suggest that the Dutch RIs host an active and fertile research community in terms of public communication of science. This study also provides evidence that RIs with specific public engagement plans perform better than RIs without them. However, this study also highlights large differences between the science communication policy setting in the Dutch Research Agenda and policy implementation at RI levels and indicates a need for a clarification in terms coordination and responsibility for institutional public engagement implementation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142806670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5819ffa0-12ea-3cb7-a43b-27298b049e2c/
U2 - 10.4324/9781003027133-12
DO - 10.4324/9781003027133-12
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85142806670
SN - 9781000580549
T3 - Public Communication of Research Universities
SP - 153
EP - 167
BT - Public Communication of Research Universities
PB - Taylor and Francis
ER -