Risk Assessment for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Using Polygenic Risk Scores

Bahar Sedaghati-Khayat, Cindy G. Boer, Jos Runhaar, Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, Linda Broer, M. Arfan Ikram, Eleftheria Zeggini, André G. Uitterlinden, Jeroen G.J. van Rooij, Joyce B.J. van Meurs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) allow risk stratification using common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and clinical applications are currently explored for several diseases. This study was undertaken to assess the risk of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) using PRS. Methods: We analyzed 12,732 individuals from a population-based cohort from the Rotterdam Study (n = 11,496), a clinical cohort (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee [CHECK] study; n = 908), and a high-risk cohort of overweight women (Prevention of Knee OA in Overweight Females [PROOF] study; n = 328), for the association of the PRS with prevalence/incidence of radiographic OA, of clinical OA, and of total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). The hip PRS and knee PRS contained 44 and 24 independent SNPs, respectively, and were derived from a recent genome-wide association study meta-analysis. Standardized PRS (with Z transformation) were used in all analyses. Results: We found a stronger association of the PRS for clinically defined OA compared to radiographic OA phenotypes, and we observed the highest PRS risk stratification for TKR/THR. The odds ratio (OR) per SD was 1.3 for incident THR (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1–1.5) and 1.6 (95% CI 1.3–1.9) for incident TKR in the Rotterdam Study. The knee PRS was associated with incident clinical knee OA in the CHECK study (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1–1.5]), but not for the PROOF study (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.8–1.7]). The OR for OA increased gradually across the PRS distribution, up to 2.1 (95% CI 1.4–3.2) for individuals with the 10% highest PRS compared to the middle 50% of the PRS distribution. Conclusion: Our findings validated the association of PRS across OA definitions. Since OA is becoming frequent and primary prevention is not commonly applicable, PRS-based risk assessment could play a role in OA prevention. However, the utility of PRS is dependent on the setting. Further studies are needed to test the integration of genetic risk assessment in diverse health care settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1488-1496
Number of pages9
JournalArthritis and Rheumatology
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022
Externally publishedYes


  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
  • Female
  • Genome-Wide Association Study
  • Humans
  • Multifactorial Inheritance
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnostic imaging
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging
  • Overweight/complications
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors


Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Assessment for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Using Polygenic Risk Scores'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this