The mutational impact of culturing human pluripotent and adult stem cells

Ewart Kuijk, Myrthe Jager, Bastiaan van der Roest, Mauro D Locati, Arne Van Hoeck, Jerome Korzelius, Roel Janssen, Nicolle Besselink, Sander Boymans, Ruben van Boxtel, Edwin Cuppen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Genetic changes acquired during in vitro culture pose a risk for the successful application of stem cells in regenerative medicine. To assess the genetic risks induced by culturing, we determined all mutations in individual human stem cells by whole genome sequencing. Individual pluripotent, intestinal, and liver stem cells accumulate 3.5 ± 0.5, 7.2 ± 1.1 and 8.3 ± 3.6 base substitutions per population doubling, respectively. The annual in vitro mutation accumulation rate of adult stem cells is nearly 40-fold higher than the in vivo mutation accumulation rate. Mutational signature analysis reveals that in vitro induced mutations are caused by oxidative stress. Reducing oxygen tension in culture lowers the mutational load. We use the mutation rates, spectra, and genomic distribution to model the accumulation of oncogenic mutations during typical in vitro expansion, manipulation or screening experiments using human stem cells. Our study provides empirically defined parameters to assess the mutational risk of stem cell based therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2493
Pages (from-to)2493
JournalNature communications
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2020

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Adult Stem Cells/cytology
  • Algorithms
  • Cells, Cultured
  • DNA Mutational Analysis/methods
  • Humans
  • Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology
  • Intestines/cytology
  • Liver/cytology
  • Models, Genetic
  • Mutation
  • Mutation Accumulation
  • Mutation Rate
  • Regenerative Medicine/methods
  • Whole Genome Sequencing/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The mutational impact of culturing human pluripotent and adult stem cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this