Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic medulloblastoma and prognostic relevance of clinical and biologic parameters

  • André O. Von Bueren
  • , Rolf Dieter Kortmann
  • , Katja Von Hoff
  • , Carsten Friedrich
  • , Martin Mynarek
  • , Klaus Müller
  • , Tobias Goschzik
  • , Anja Zur Mühlen
  • , Nicolas Gerber
  • , Monika Warmuth-Metz
  • , Niels Soerensen
  • , Frank Deinlein
  • , Martin Benesch
  • , Isabella Zwiener
  • , Robert Kwiecien
  • , Andreas Faldum
  • , Udo Bode
  • , Gudrun Fleischhack
  • , Volker Hovestadt
  • , Marcel Kool
  • David Jones, Paul Northcott, Joachim Kuehl, Stefan Pfister, Torsten Pietsch, Stefan Rutkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

156 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess an intensified treatment in the context of clinical and biologic risk factors in metastatic medulloblastoma. Patients and Methods: Patients (4 to 21 years old, diagnosed between 2001 and 2007) received induction chemotherapy, dose-escalated hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy, and maintenance chemotherapy. Subgroup status and other biologic parameters were assessed. Results: In 123 eligible patients (median age, 8.2 years old; median follow-up, 5.38 years), 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 62% (95% CI, 52 to 72) and 74% (95% CI, 66 to 82), respectively. OS was superior compared with the precedent HIT '91 trial. The 5-year EFS and OS were both 89% (95% CI, 67 to 100) for desmoplastic/nodular (n = 11), 61% (95% CI, 51 to 71) and 75% (95% CI, 65 to 85) for classic (n = 107), and 20% (95% CI, 0 to 55) and 40% (95% CI, 0 to 83) for large-cell/anaplastic (n = 5) medulloblastoma (P < .001 for EFS; P = .001 for OS). Histology (hazard ratio, 0.19 for desmoplastic/nodular and 45.97 for large-cell/anaplastic medulloblastoma) and nonresponse to the first chemotherapy cycle (hazard ratio, 1.97) were independent risk factors (EFS). Among 81 (66%) patients with tumor material, 5-year EFS and OS differed between low-risk (wingless [WNT], n = 4; both 100%), high-risk (MYCC/MYCN amplification; n = 5, both 20%), and intermediate-risk patients (neither; n = 72, 63% and 73%, respectively). Survival rates were different between molecular subgroups (WNT, n = 4; sonic hedgehog [SHH; n = 4]; group 4 [n = 41]; group 3 with [n = 3] or without [n = 17] MYCC/MYCN amplification; P < .001). All cases showed p53 immuno-negativity. There was no association between patients with nonresponding tumors to induction chemotherapy and WNT (P = .143) or MYCC/MYCN status (P = .075), histologic subtype (P = .814), or molecular subtype (P = .383), as assessed by Fisher's exact test. Conclusion: This regimen was feasible and conferred overall favorable survival. Our data confirm the relevance of subgroup status and biologic parameters (WNT/MYCC/MYCN status) in a homogeneous prospective trial population, and show that metastatic group 3 patients do not uniformly have poor outcomes. Biologic subgroup, MYCC/MYCN status, response to induction chemotherapy, and histologic subtype may serve for improved treatment stratification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4151-4160
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume34
Issue number34
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic medulloblastoma and prognostic relevance of clinical and biologic parameters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this