Treatment of hereditary angioedema with nanofiltered C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate (Cetor®): Multi-center phase II and III studies to assess pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety

  • J. J. Hofstra
  • , I. Kleine Budde
  • , E. van Twuyver
  • , G. Choi
  • , M. Levi
  • , F. W.G. Leebeek
  • , J. G.R. de Monchy
  • , P. F. Ypma
  • , R. J. Keizer
  • , A. D.R. Huitema
  • , P. F.W. Strengers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From 1997, plasma-derived C1-inhibitor concentrate (Cetor®) has been available to HAE and AAE patients. Recently, a virus reducing 15. nm nanofiltration step has been introduced in the production process. A randomized, double-blind controlled cross-over study was performed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of nanofiltered (C1-INH-NF) with conventional C1-inhibitor (C1-INH). Efficacy and safety were investigated in an open-label, on-demand and a prophylactic study. No differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between C1-INH and C1-INH-NF were found (13 non-symptomatic HAE patients). Both C1-inhibitor products equally increased plasma C4 levels. In the on-demand study, 14 acute angioedema attacks in 8 patients were analyzed. In the prophylactic study, 1 AAE and 5 HAE patients experienced in total 31 attacks during 748 observation days. In total 180,000 units of C1-INH-NF were administered. No product-related adverse events occurred, and no anti-C1-antibodies were induced. Nanofiltration in the production process of C1-inhibitor did not affect the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-290
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Immunology
Volume142
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Angioedema
  • Nanofiltration
  • Plasma-derived c1-inhibitor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of hereditary angioedema with nanofiltered C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate (Cetor®): Multi-center phase II and III studies to assess pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this