TY - JOUR
T1 - A conceptual framework for patient-directed knowledge tools to support patient-centred care
T2 - Results from an evidence-informed consensus meeting
AU - Dreesens, Dunja
AU - Stiggelbout, Anne
AU - Agoritsas, Thomas
AU - Elwyn, Glyn
AU - Flottorp, Signe
AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy
AU - Kremer, Leontien
AU - Santesso, Nancy
AU - Stacey, Dawn
AU - Treweek, Shaun
AU - Armstrong, Melissa
AU - Gagliardi, Anna
AU - Hill, Sophie
AU - Légaré, France
AU - Ryan, Rebecca
AU - Vandvik, Per
AU - van der Weijden, Trudy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Objective: Patient-directed knowledge tools are designed to engage patients in dialogue or deliberation, to support patient decision-making or self-care of chronic conditions. However, an abundance of these exists. The tools themselves and their purposes are not always clearly defined; creating challenges for developers and users (professionals, patients). The study's aim was to develop a conceptual framework of patient-directed knowledge tool types. Methods: A face-to-face evidence-informed consensus meeting with 15 international experts. After the meeting, the framework went through two rounds of feedback before informal consensus was reached. Results: A conceptual framework containing five patient-directed knowledge tool types was developed. The first part of the framework describes the tools’ purposes and the second focuses on the tools’ core elements. Conclusion: The framework provides clarity on which types of patient-directed tools exist, the purposes they serve, and which core elements they prototypically include. It is a working framework and will require further refinement as the area develops, alongside validation with a broader group of stakeholders. Practice implications: The framework assists developers and users to know which type a tool belongs, its purpose and core elements, helping them to develop and use the right tool for the right job.
AB - Objective: Patient-directed knowledge tools are designed to engage patients in dialogue or deliberation, to support patient decision-making or self-care of chronic conditions. However, an abundance of these exists. The tools themselves and their purposes are not always clearly defined; creating challenges for developers and users (professionals, patients). The study's aim was to develop a conceptual framework of patient-directed knowledge tool types. Methods: A face-to-face evidence-informed consensus meeting with 15 international experts. After the meeting, the framework went through two rounds of feedback before informal consensus was reached. Results: A conceptual framework containing five patient-directed knowledge tool types was developed. The first part of the framework describes the tools’ purposes and the second focuses on the tools’ core elements. Conclusion: The framework provides clarity on which types of patient-directed tools exist, the purposes they serve, and which core elements they prototypically include. It is a working framework and will require further refinement as the area develops, alongside validation with a broader group of stakeholders. Practice implications: The framework assists developers and users to know which type a tool belongs, its purpose and core elements, helping them to develop and use the right tool for the right job.
KW - (Shared) decision-making
KW - Communication
KW - Framework
KW - Knowledge
KW - Patient education
KW - Tools
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065775273&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2019.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 31118137
AN - SCOPUS:85065775273
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 102
SP - 1898
EP - 1904
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 10
ER -