TY - JOUR
T1 - A harmonized measure of activities of daily living was a reliable and valid instrument for comparing disability in older people across countries
AU - Pluijm, S. M.F.
AU - Bardage, C.
AU - Nikula, S.
AU - Blumstein, T.
AU - Jylhä, M.
AU - Minicuci, N.
AU - Zunzunegui, M. V.
AU - Pedersen, N. L.
AU - Deeg, D. J.H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The CLESA Project is supported by EU QoL2000-00664. The TamELSA study is supported by the Academy of Finland, the Juho Vainio Foundation, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, and the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital. CALAS was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Institute on Aging (grants R01-5885-03 and R01-5885-06). ILSA was supported by the CNR (National Research Council) and the Italian Department of Health–National Institutes of Health. LASA is supported by the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports and the Vrije Universiteit. Aging in Leganés is supported by the Spanish Health Research Fund (FIS), the Madrid Regional Research Fund, and private foundations (La Caixa, BBVA). SATSA is supported by the U.S. NIH Institute on Aging (grants AG 04563 and 10175) and the Swedish Social Research Council.
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - Background and Objectives: Our aim was to construct a harmonized measure of activities of daily living (ADL) across six countries, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of this measure. Methods: A population of 9,297 persons, aged 65-89 years, was drawn from the Comparison of Longitudinal European Studies on Aging (CLESA) study, which includes data from five European countries and Israel. Because the number, type, and response format of the ADL items differed across the six studies, a four-item scale was constructed to harmonize the data, using items common to most countries. A procedure was devised to substitute or construct items that were not available in two of the countries. Results: Cronbach's α for the four-item ADL measure varied from 0.81 in Spain to 0.92 in Finland, and was similar to the α of scales including five or six items. Kappa scores between substituted or constructed items and the actual items varied from 0.50 to 0.78. In all countries, the percentage of persons with ADL disability differed significantly across age and was associated with chronic diseases, poor self-rated health, global disability, and home help utilization. Conclusion: The harmonized four-item ADL measure seems a reliable and valid instrument for comparing ADL disability in older people across countries.
AB - Background and Objectives: Our aim was to construct a harmonized measure of activities of daily living (ADL) across six countries, and to evaluate the reliability and validity of this measure. Methods: A population of 9,297 persons, aged 65-89 years, was drawn from the Comparison of Longitudinal European Studies on Aging (CLESA) study, which includes data from five European countries and Israel. Because the number, type, and response format of the ADL items differed across the six studies, a four-item scale was constructed to harmonize the data, using items common to most countries. A procedure was devised to substitute or construct items that were not available in two of the countries. Results: Cronbach's α for the four-item ADL measure varied from 0.81 in Spain to 0.92 in Finland, and was similar to the α of scales including five or six items. Kappa scores between substituted or constructed items and the actual items varied from 0.50 to 0.78. In all countries, the percentage of persons with ADL disability differed significantly across age and was associated with chronic diseases, poor self-rated health, global disability, and home help utilization. Conclusion: The harmonized four-item ADL measure seems a reliable and valid instrument for comparing ADL disability in older people across countries.
KW - Activities of daily living
KW - Elderly
KW - Harmonization
KW - International comparison
KW - Reliability
KW - Validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24944475667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 16168347
AN - SCOPUS:24944475667
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 58
SP - 1015
EP - 1023
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
IS - 10
ER -