TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone health of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
T2 - A comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and digital X-ray radiogrammetry
AU - Nusman, Charlotte M.
AU - Anink, Janneke
AU - Otten, Marieke H.
AU - Van Rossum, Marion A.J.
AU - Van Rijn, Rick R.
AU - Maas, Mario
AU - Van Suijlekom-Smit, Lisette W.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Objectives Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) affects bone mineral density (BMD). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely used technique to determine BMD. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) is a feasible method for determination of cortical BMD on hand radiographs. This study aimed to compare DXR and DXA in the assessment of BMD in JIA patients. Methods Thirty-five JIA patients with available DXA and hand radiograph within the same time period were included from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children register. Outcome measures for BMD were Bone Health Index from DXR and BMD total body, BMD lumbar spine and Bone Mineral Apparent Density from DXA. All measures were transformed to Z-scores. Correlations were assessed with Pearson correlation coefficients. Results Median age of the patients (60% female) was 11.7 years. Pearson correlation coefficient was significant for the absolute scores: 0.568-0.770 (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the Z-scores of DXA and DXR. Conclusions The BMD assessment from the DXR was correlated to DXA measures in a cohort of JIA patients, although only in absolute scores. Future steps for implementation of DXR in clinical practice include evaluation of responsiveness to change, predictive value and comparison with other imaging techniques.
AB - Objectives Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) affects bone mineral density (BMD). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely used technique to determine BMD. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) is a feasible method for determination of cortical BMD on hand radiographs. This study aimed to compare DXR and DXA in the assessment of BMD in JIA patients. Methods Thirty-five JIA patients with available DXA and hand radiograph within the same time period were included from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children register. Outcome measures for BMD were Bone Health Index from DXR and BMD total body, BMD lumbar spine and Bone Mineral Apparent Density from DXA. All measures were transformed to Z-scores. Correlations were assessed with Pearson correlation coefficients. Results Median age of the patients (60% female) was 11.7 years. Pearson correlation coefficient was significant for the absolute scores: 0.568-0.770 (p < 0.001). No significant correlation was found between the Z-scores of DXA and DXR. Conclusions The BMD assessment from the DXR was correlated to DXA measures in a cohort of JIA patients, although only in absolute scores. Future steps for implementation of DXR in clinical practice include evaluation of responsiveness to change, predictive value and comparison with other imaging techniques.
KW - Bone density
KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
KW - Etanercept
KW - Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
KW - Radiography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941806592&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 26116967
AN - SCOPUS:84941806592
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 84
SP - 1999
EP - 2003
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 10
ER -