Case-control analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation versus maintenance chemotherapy for relapsed ALL in children

In a retrospective study, the results of maintenance chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for children who reached a second complete remission (CR2) of their acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were compared. Case-control analysis was performed comparing 25 allogeneic transplant patients (cases) with 97 patients treated with maintenance chemotherapy (controls), who were matched for site of relapse, duration of CR1 and leukemia-free interval from onset of CR2. Until the first relapse, the children were treated according to standard protocols. The majority of patients suffered from a bone marrow relapse, mostly occurring more than 24 months after the onset of CR1. Remission reinduction treatment was heterogeneous. Patients treated with allogeneic BMT received high-dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation prior to BMT. Maintenance chemotherapy in controls was given for approximately 2 years. Following BMT, relapse rate was lower but the treatment-related mortality was higher compared with maintenance chemotherapy, resulting in leukemia-free survival rates at 4 years of 44% and 24%, respectively (not significant, NS). Case-control analysis of leukemia-free survival showed a hazard ratio of 0.756 in favor of BMT compared with chemotherapy (NS). If bone marrow relapses and central nervous system relapses were analyzed separately, a tendency to better leukemia-free survival was present after BMT compared with maintenance chemotherapy for patients with a relapse in the central nervous system, but for an isolated bone marrow relapse, no differences in leukemia-free survival were seen between the two groups of patients.