TY - JOUR
T1 - cIMPACT-NOW update 11
T2 - Proposal on adaptation of diagnostic criteria for IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas and for posterior fossa ependymal tumors
AU - Wesseling, Pieter
AU - Capper, David
AU - Reifenberger, Guido
AU - Sarkar, Chitra
AU - Hawkins, Cynthia
AU - Perry, Arie
AU - Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, Bette
AU - Komori, Takashi
AU - Paulus, Werner
AU - Santosh, Vani
AU - van den Bent, Martin
AU - Weller, Michael
AU - Pfister, Stefan M.
AU - Tabori, Uri
AU - Figarella-Branger, Dominique
AU - Orr, Brent A.
AU - Louis, David N.
N1 - © 2025 The Author(s). Brain Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Neuropathology.
PY - 2026/1
Y1 - 2026/1
N2 - The Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to Central Nervous System Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) updates provide guidelines for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and suggestions for future World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Following publication of the fifth edition WHO Classification of CNS Tumors (WHO CNS5) in 2021, the cIMPACT-NOW working group “Clarification” reviewed WHO CNS5 and prioritized two topics for further elucidation: (a) distinction of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype from Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype and (b) clarification of subgroups of posterior fossa (PF) ependymal tumors. Recommendations regarding the IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas include: (1) use caution assigning CNS WHO grade 4 (diagnosis of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype) to a “TERT promoter only”, histologically low-grade, IDH-wildtype tumor; (2) EGFR gene amplification and +7/−10 chromosome copy number alterations should not be used as solitary defining features for diagnosing high-grade gliomas as Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in patients <40 years of age; (3) Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype should be considered in the differential diagnosis in adults, especially those <40 years of age; (4) PDGFRA alteration, EGFR alteration, or MYCN amplification count as key molecular features of Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype only in patients <25 years. Guidelines for improved diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymal tumors include: (1) immunohistochemical demonstration of nuclear EZHIP supports classification as PF group A ependymoma; (2) a PF ependymoma with retained nuclear H3 K27me3 expression and no nuclear EZHIP overexpression for which DNA methylation profiling is not performed should be considered as PF ependymoma, “not otherwise specified”; (3) for emerging tumors not included in WHO CNS5, “not elsewhere classified” (NEC) can be added to the diagnosis. Of note, these recommendations are not formal changes to the WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria but are intended to provide diagnostic guidance in advance of WHO CNS6.
AB - The Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to Central Nervous System Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) updates provide guidelines for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and suggestions for future World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Following publication of the fifth edition WHO Classification of CNS Tumors (WHO CNS5) in 2021, the cIMPACT-NOW working group “Clarification” reviewed WHO CNS5 and prioritized two topics for further elucidation: (a) distinction of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype from Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype and (b) clarification of subgroups of posterior fossa (PF) ependymal tumors. Recommendations regarding the IDH- and H3-wildtype diffuse high-grade gliomas include: (1) use caution assigning CNS WHO grade 4 (diagnosis of Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype) to a “TERT promoter only”, histologically low-grade, IDH-wildtype tumor; (2) EGFR gene amplification and +7/−10 chromosome copy number alterations should not be used as solitary defining features for diagnosing high-grade gliomas as Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in patients <40 years of age; (3) Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype should be considered in the differential diagnosis in adults, especially those <40 years of age; (4) PDGFRA alteration, EGFR alteration, or MYCN amplification count as key molecular features of Diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype only in patients <25 years. Guidelines for improved diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymal tumors include: (1) immunohistochemical demonstration of nuclear EZHIP supports classification as PF group A ependymoma; (2) a PF ependymoma with retained nuclear H3 K27me3 expression and no nuclear EZHIP overexpression for which DNA methylation profiling is not performed should be considered as PF ependymoma, “not otherwise specified”; (3) for emerging tumors not included in WHO CNS5, “not elsewhere classified” (NEC) can be added to the diagnosis. Of note, these recommendations are not formal changes to the WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria but are intended to provide diagnostic guidance in advance of WHO CNS6.
KW - Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype
KW - WHO classification
KW - cIMPACT-NOW
KW - clarification
KW - diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma
KW - posterior fossa ependymoma
KW - Ependymoma/diagnosis
KW - World Health Organization
KW - Humans
KW - Brain Neoplasms/genetics
KW - Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/genetics
KW - Glioma/diagnosis
KW - Neoplasm Grading
KW - Infratentorial Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Histones/genetics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014740481
U2 - 10.1111/bpa.70035
DO - 10.1111/bpa.70035
M3 - Article
C2 - 40887057
AN - SCOPUS:105014740481
SN - 1015-6305
VL - 36
JO - Brain Pathology
JF - Brain Pathology
IS - 1
M1 - e70035
ER -