TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic value of a ghrelin test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency after subarachnoid hemorrhage
AU - Blijdorp, K.
AU - Khajeh, L.
AU - M Ribbers, G. M.
AU - Sneekes, E. M.
AU - Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H.
AU - Van Den Berg-Emons, H. J.G.
AU - Van Der Lely, A. J.
AU - Van Kooten, F.
AU - Neggers, S. J.C.M.M.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of a ghrelin test in the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) shortly after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Design: Prospective single-center observational cohort study. Methods: A ghrelin test was assessed after the acute phase of SAH and a GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-arginine test 6 months post SAH. Primary outcome was the diagnostic value of a ghrelin test compared with the GHRH-arginine test in the diagnosis of GHD. The secondary outcome was to assess the safety of the ghrelin test, including patients' comfort, adverse events, and idiosyncratic reactions. Results: Forty-three survivors of SAH were included (15 males, 35%, mean age 56.6G11.7). Six out of 43 (14%) SAH survivors were diagnosed with GHD by GHRH-arginine test. In GHD subjects, median GH peak during ghrelin test was significantly lower than that of non-GHD subjects (5.4 vs 16.6, PZ0.002). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.869. A cutoff limit of a GH peak of 15 mg/l corresponded with a sensitivity of 100% and a false-positive rate of 40%. No adverse events or idiosyncratic reactions were observed in subjects undergoing a ghrelin test, except for one subject who reported flushing shortly after ghrelin infusion. Conclusion: Owing to its convenience, validity, and safety, the ghrelin test might be a valuable GH provocative test, especially in the early phase of SAH.
AB - Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of a ghrelin test in the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) shortly after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Design: Prospective single-center observational cohort study. Methods: A ghrelin test was assessed after the acute phase of SAH and a GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-arginine test 6 months post SAH. Primary outcome was the diagnostic value of a ghrelin test compared with the GHRH-arginine test in the diagnosis of GHD. The secondary outcome was to assess the safety of the ghrelin test, including patients' comfort, adverse events, and idiosyncratic reactions. Results: Forty-three survivors of SAH were included (15 males, 35%, mean age 56.6G11.7). Six out of 43 (14%) SAH survivors were diagnosed with GHD by GHRH-arginine test. In GHD subjects, median GH peak during ghrelin test was significantly lower than that of non-GHD subjects (5.4 vs 16.6, PZ0.002). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.869. A cutoff limit of a GH peak of 15 mg/l corresponded with a sensitivity of 100% and a false-positive rate of 40%. No adverse events or idiosyncratic reactions were observed in subjects undergoing a ghrelin test, except for one subject who reported flushing shortly after ghrelin infusion. Conclusion: Owing to its convenience, validity, and safety, the ghrelin test might be a valuable GH provocative test, especially in the early phase of SAH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884874470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1530/EJE-13-0436
DO - 10.1530/EJE-13-0436
M3 - Article
C2 - 24037787
AN - SCOPUS:84884874470
SN - 0804-4643
VL - 169
SP - 497
EP - 502
JO - European Journal of Endocrinology
JF - European Journal of Endocrinology
IS - 4
ER -