TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in haematological cancer patients with neutropenia
T2 - ECIL critical appraisal of previous guidelines
AU - a joint venture of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the International Immunocompromised Host Society (ICHS) and the European Leukemia Net (ELN)
AU - European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL)
AU - Mikulska, Malgorzata
AU - Averbuch, Diana
AU - Tissot, Frederic
AU - Cordonnier, Catherine
AU - Akova, Murat
AU - Calandra, Thierry
AU - Ceppi, Marcello
AU - Bruzzi, Paolo
AU - Viscoli, Claudio
AU - Aljurf, Mahmoud
AU - Averbuch, Dina
AU - Barnes, Rosemary
AU - Blennow, Ola
AU - Bochud, Pierre Yves
AU - Bouza, Emilio
AU - Bretagne, Stephane
AU - Brüggemann, Roger
AU - Carratala, Jordi
AU - Cesaro, Simone
AU - Cornely, Oliver
AU - Dalianis, Tina
AU - De La Camara, Rafael
AU - Donnelly, Peter
AU - Drgona, Lubos
AU - Duarte, Rafael
AU - Einsele, Hermann
AU - Engelhard, Dan
AU - Fox, Christopher
AU - Girmenia, Corrado
AU - Groll, Andreas
AU - Heldal, Dag
AU - Larsen, Jannick Helweg
AU - Herbrecht, Raoul
AU - Hirsch, Hans
AU - Johnson, Elisabeth
AU - Klyasova, Galina
AU - Koskuenvo, Minna
AU - Lagrou, Katrien
AU - Lewis, Russel E.
AU - Ljungman, Per
AU - Maertens, Johan
AU - Maschmeyer, Georg
AU - Nucci, Marcio
AU - Padoin, Christophe
AU - Pagano, Livio
AU - Pagliuca, Antonio
AU - Racil, Zdenek
AU - Ribaud, Patricia
AU - Rinaldo, Christine
AU - Puechal, Valérie Rizzi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The British Infection Association
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Objectives Fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis was recommended in 2005 by European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) for patients with prolonged neutropenia. In consideration of a worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance, the issue of FQ prophylaxis during neutropenia was re-evaluated. Methods Literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published in years 2006–2014 was performed. Their results were analysed in meta-analysis. Meta-regression model was applied to evaluate whether the rates of FQ resistance in community and hospital settings influenced the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis. The impact of FQ prophylaxis on colonisation and infection with resistant bacteria was reviewed. Results Two RCTs and 12 observational studies were identified. FQ prophylaxis did not have effect on mortality (pooled OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.73–1.41), but was associated with lower rate of bloodstream infections (BSI) (pooled OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.43–0.74) and episodes of fever during neutropenia (pooled OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.20–0.50). No effect of the background rate of FQ resistance on the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis was observed. In few studies, FQ prophylaxis resulted in an increased colonisation or infection with FQ- or multi-drug resistant strains. Conclusions The possible benefits of FQ prophylaxis on BSI rate, but not on overall mortality, should be weighed against its impact in terms of toxicity and changes in local ecology in single centres.
AB - Objectives Fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis was recommended in 2005 by European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) for patients with prolonged neutropenia. In consideration of a worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance, the issue of FQ prophylaxis during neutropenia was re-evaluated. Methods Literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published in years 2006–2014 was performed. Their results were analysed in meta-analysis. Meta-regression model was applied to evaluate whether the rates of FQ resistance in community and hospital settings influenced the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis. The impact of FQ prophylaxis on colonisation and infection with resistant bacteria was reviewed. Results Two RCTs and 12 observational studies were identified. FQ prophylaxis did not have effect on mortality (pooled OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.73–1.41), but was associated with lower rate of bloodstream infections (BSI) (pooled OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.43–0.74) and episodes of fever during neutropenia (pooled OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.20–0.50). No effect of the background rate of FQ resistance on the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis was observed. In few studies, FQ prophylaxis resulted in an increased colonisation or infection with FQ- or multi-drug resistant strains. Conclusions The possible benefits of FQ prophylaxis on BSI rate, but not on overall mortality, should be weighed against its impact in terms of toxicity and changes in local ecology in single centres.
KW - Ciprofloxacin
KW - Febrile neutropenia
KW - Infection
KW - Levofloxacin
KW - Multidrug resistance (MDR)
KW - Neutropenic
KW - Prevention
KW - Quinolone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034446796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.10.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.10.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 29079323
AN - SCOPUS:85034446796
SN - 0163-4453
VL - 76
SP - 20
EP - 37
JO - Journal of Infection
JF - Journal of Infection
IS - 1
ER -