TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare providers' expected barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centered long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors
T2 - A PanCareFollowUp study
AU - the PanCareFollowUp Consortium
AU - Breij, Dionne
AU - Hjorth, Lars
AU - Bouwman, Eline
AU - Walraven, Iris
AU - Kepak, Tomas
AU - Kepakova, Katerina
AU - Haupt, Riccardo
AU - Muraca, Monica
AU - Göttgens, Irene
AU - Stollman, Iridi
AU - Winther, Jeanette Falck
AU - Kienesberger, Anita
AU - Gsell, Hannah
AU - Michel, Gisela
AU - Blijlevens, Nicole
AU - Pluijm, Saskia M.F.
AU - Roser, Katharina
AU - Skinner, Roderick
AU - Renard, Marleen
AU - Uyttebroeck, Anne
AU - Follin, Cecilia
AU - van der Pal, Helena J.H.
AU - Kremer, Leontien C.M.
AU - Loonen, Jaqueline
AU - Hermens, Rosella
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Background: Childhood cancer survivors face high risks of adverse late health effects. Long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors is crucial to improve their health and quality of life. However, implementation remains a challenge. To support implementation of high-quality long-term follow-up care, we explored expected barriers and facilitators for establishing this follow-up care among healthcare providers from four European clinics. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using four focus groups comprising 30 healthcare providers in total. The semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the Grol and Wensing framework. Data was analyzed following a thematic analysis, combining both inductive and deductive approaches to identify barriers and facilitators across the six levels of Grol and Wensing: innovation, professional, patient, social, organizational and economic and political. Results: Most barriers were identified on the organizational level, including insufficient staff, time, capacity and psychosocial support. Other main barriers included limited knowledge of late effects among healthcare providers outside the long-term follow-up care team, inability of some survivors to complete the survivor questionnaire and financial resources. Main facilitators included motivated healthcare providers and survivors, a skilled hospital team, collaborations with important stakeholders like general practitioners, and psychosocial care facilities, utilization of the international collaboration and reporting long-term follow-up care results to convince hospital managers. Conclusion: This study identified several factors for successful implementation of long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors. Our findings showed that specific attention should be given to knowledge, capacity, and financial issues, along with addressing psychosocial issues of survivors.
AB - Background: Childhood cancer survivors face high risks of adverse late health effects. Long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors is crucial to improve their health and quality of life. However, implementation remains a challenge. To support implementation of high-quality long-term follow-up care, we explored expected barriers and facilitators for establishing this follow-up care among healthcare providers from four European clinics. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using four focus groups comprising 30 healthcare providers in total. The semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the Grol and Wensing framework. Data was analyzed following a thematic analysis, combining both inductive and deductive approaches to identify barriers and facilitators across the six levels of Grol and Wensing: innovation, professional, patient, social, organizational and economic and political. Results: Most barriers were identified on the organizational level, including insufficient staff, time, capacity and psychosocial support. Other main barriers included limited knowledge of late effects among healthcare providers outside the long-term follow-up care team, inability of some survivors to complete the survivor questionnaire and financial resources. Main facilitators included motivated healthcare providers and survivors, a skilled hospital team, collaborations with important stakeholders like general practitioners, and psychosocial care facilities, utilization of the international collaboration and reporting long-term follow-up care results to convince hospital managers. Conclusion: This study identified several factors for successful implementation of long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors. Our findings showed that specific attention should be given to knowledge, capacity, and financial issues, along with addressing psychosocial issues of survivors.
KW - barriers and facilitators
KW - cancer survivorship
KW - childhood cancer
KW - follow-up care
KW - healthcare providers
KW - implementation science
KW - late effects
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207218465
U2 - 10.1002/cam4.70225
DO - 10.1002/cam4.70225
M3 - Article
C2 - 39440690
AN - SCOPUS:85207218465
SN - 2045-7634
VL - 13
JO - Cancer Medicine
JF - Cancer Medicine
IS - 20
M1 - e70225
ER -