TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated biomarker and treatment correlates of prognosis in infant non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma
T2 - a multinational retrospective cohort study
AU - Richardson, Stacey
AU - Hicks, Debbie
AU - Gough, Melissa
AU - Butler, Ellie R.
AU - Thompson, Dean
AU - Castle, Jemma
AU - Crosier, Stephen
AU - Garcia-Ariza, Miguel
AU - Martín-Guerrero, Idoia
AU - Plasschaert, Sabine
AU - Bourdeaut, Franck
AU - Dufour, Christelle
AU - Masliah-Planchon, Julien
AU - Buttarelli, Francesca Romana
AU - Biassoni, Veronica
AU - Massimino, Maura
AU - Ichimura, Koichi
AU - Kanemura, Yonehiro
AU - Ramaswamy, Vijay
AU - Gajjar, Amar
AU - Mynarek, Martin
AU - Rutkowski, Stefan
AU - Kool, Marcel
AU - Pfister, Stefan M.
AU - Korshunov, Andrey
AU - Schwalbe, Edward C.
AU - Bailey, Simon
AU - Clifford, Steven C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
PY - 2026/7
Y1 - 2026/7
N2 - Background: Infant medulloblastoma (age <3–5 years at diagnosis) is a major challenge in paediatric oncology. Clinical studies of molecularly defined non-WNT/non-SHH infant medulloblastoma (~60% of cases) have not been done, and this group is currently considered to have uniformly high risk. Understanding the potential for its biological subclassification and clinical stratification is an essential goal towards improved outcomes. This study therefore aimed to directly compare different therapeutic approaches in non-WNT/non-SHH infant medulloblastoma and assess the relationships between outcomes and clinicomolecular features. Methods: We assembled an international cohort of infants with non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma identified from non-trial cohorts in nine countries. Inclusion criteria were age 0–5 years and a principal non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma classification (group 3 [MBGroup3] or group 4 [MBGroup4]; confidence score >0·8) using DNA methylation array-based classification. Patient clinical and molecular data were collected from contributing institutions and centrally reviewed using standardised annotation protocols. A survival cohort was defined by the availability of complete progression-free and overall survival data, and grouped by whether principal upfront therapy included craniospinal irradiation or consisted of chemotherapy only. Chemotherapy was subclassified into high-dose, intraventricular methotrexate-based, and standard-dose regimens. We assessed the relationships between tumour molecular pathology, treatments received, and outcomes (progression-free and overall survival) using Kaplan–Meier plots, univariable log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Findings: The total collected cohort (n=375) comprised 262 males and 110 females (three patients had missing sex data), with a median age of 3·0 years (IQR 2·5–4·0). MBGroup3 tumours predominated (246 [66%] of 375 patients), among which molecular subgroups 4 (98 [40%]), 2 (75 [30%]), and 3 (46 [19%]) were most common. The remaining 129 (34%) of 375 patients had MBGroup4 tumours. 313 patients were included in the survival cohort. Upfront craniospinal irradiation was associated with significantly better 5-year progression-free survival (62% [95% CI 55–70]) than non-craniospinal irradiation approaches (including focal radiotherapy or chemotherapy-only strategies; 33% [23–44]; p<0·0001). When upfront chemotherapy-only approaches were used, high-dose chemotherapy produced better survival rates (5-year overall survival 60% [95% CI 42–87]) than standard-dose chemotherapy (27% [13–57]). Patients with MBGroup3 subgroup 4 represented a novel chemosensitive group, with 5-year progression-free survival of 64% (95% CI 44–95) when treated upfront with high-dose chemotherapy only (n=14). Patients with MBGroup3 subgroup 2 or 3 with MYC amplification (n=10) had 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 0% when treated with chemotherapy only. Patients with MBGroup3 subgroup 2 or 3 without MYC amplification who were treated upfront with chemotherapy only (n=10) had 5-year progression-free survival of 30% (12–77) and 5-year overall survival of 58% (34–100). Interpretation: Non-WNT/non-SHH infant medulloblastoma outcomes are associated with specific biomarkers and type of therapy received. This real-world experience identifies a favourable-risk group (MBGroup3 subgroup 4) with good prognosis and a very-high-risk group (MBGroup3 subgroup 2 or 3 with MYC amplification) with poor prognosis, providing a foundation for biomarker-driven MBGroup3 clinical trials. Funding: Cancer Research UK, Children with Cancer UK, Children's Cancer North, Star for Harris, JGW Patterson Foundation, Little Hero, and Blue Skye Thinking.
AB - Background: Infant medulloblastoma (age <3–5 years at diagnosis) is a major challenge in paediatric oncology. Clinical studies of molecularly defined non-WNT/non-SHH infant medulloblastoma (~60% of cases) have not been done, and this group is currently considered to have uniformly high risk. Understanding the potential for its biological subclassification and clinical stratification is an essential goal towards improved outcomes. This study therefore aimed to directly compare different therapeutic approaches in non-WNT/non-SHH infant medulloblastoma and assess the relationships between outcomes and clinicomolecular features. Methods: We assembled an international cohort of infants with non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma identified from non-trial cohorts in nine countries. Inclusion criteria were age 0–5 years and a principal non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma classification (group 3 [MBGroup3] or group 4 [MBGroup4]; confidence score >0·8) using DNA methylation array-based classification. Patient clinical and molecular data were collected from contributing institutions and centrally reviewed using standardised annotation protocols. A survival cohort was defined by the availability of complete progression-free and overall survival data, and grouped by whether principal upfront therapy included craniospinal irradiation or consisted of chemotherapy only. Chemotherapy was subclassified into high-dose, intraventricular methotrexate-based, and standard-dose regimens. We assessed the relationships between tumour molecular pathology, treatments received, and outcomes (progression-free and overall survival) using Kaplan–Meier plots, univariable log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Findings: The total collected cohort (n=375) comprised 262 males and 110 females (three patients had missing sex data), with a median age of 3·0 years (IQR 2·5–4·0). MBGroup3 tumours predominated (246 [66%] of 375 patients), among which molecular subgroups 4 (98 [40%]), 2 (75 [30%]), and 3 (46 [19%]) were most common. The remaining 129 (34%) of 375 patients had MBGroup4 tumours. 313 patients were included in the survival cohort. Upfront craniospinal irradiation was associated with significantly better 5-year progression-free survival (62% [95% CI 55–70]) than non-craniospinal irradiation approaches (including focal radiotherapy or chemotherapy-only strategies; 33% [23–44]; p<0·0001). When upfront chemotherapy-only approaches were used, high-dose chemotherapy produced better survival rates (5-year overall survival 60% [95% CI 42–87]) than standard-dose chemotherapy (27% [13–57]). Patients with MBGroup3 subgroup 4 represented a novel chemosensitive group, with 5-year progression-free survival of 64% (95% CI 44–95) when treated upfront with high-dose chemotherapy only (n=14). Patients with MBGroup3 subgroup 2 or 3 with MYC amplification (n=10) had 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 0% when treated with chemotherapy only. Patients with MBGroup3 subgroup 2 or 3 without MYC amplification who were treated upfront with chemotherapy only (n=10) had 5-year progression-free survival of 30% (12–77) and 5-year overall survival of 58% (34–100). Interpretation: Non-WNT/non-SHH infant medulloblastoma outcomes are associated with specific biomarkers and type of therapy received. This real-world experience identifies a favourable-risk group (MBGroup3 subgroup 4) with good prognosis and a very-high-risk group (MBGroup3 subgroup 2 or 3 with MYC amplification) with poor prognosis, providing a foundation for biomarker-driven MBGroup3 clinical trials. Funding: Cancer Research UK, Children with Cancer UK, Children's Cancer North, Star for Harris, JGW Patterson Foundation, Little Hero, and Blue Skye Thinking.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105039520606
U2 - 10.1016/S2352-4642(26)00067-2
DO - 10.1016/S2352-4642(26)00067-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105039520606
SN - 2352-4642
VL - 10
SP - 491
EP - 504
JO - The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health
JF - The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health
IS - 7
ER -