TY - JOUR
T1 - International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Cancer Precursor Lesions. Working Group 1
T2 - The Prostate
AU - Members of the ISUP GU Cancer Precursor Consensus Panel
AU - Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
AU - De Marzo, Angelo M.
AU - Agarwal, Neeraj
AU - Berman, David M.
AU - Cimadamore, Alessia
AU - Fine, Samson W.
AU - Greenland, Nancy
AU - Khani, Francesca
AU - Loda, Massimo
AU - Lotan, Tamara L.
AU - Varma, Murali
AU - Chinnaiyan, Arul
AU - Giannarini, Gianluca
AU - Huang, Jiaoti
AU - Montironi, Rodolfo
AU - Netto, George J.
AU - Osunkoya, Adeboye O.
AU - Ratliff, Timothy
AU - Kristiansen, Glen
AU - Cheng, Liang
AU - van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.
AU - Acosta, Andres
AU - Adeniran, Adebowale
AU - Adra, Nabil
AU - Akgul, Mahmut
AU - Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat
AU - Algaba, Ferran
AU - Allory, Yves
AU - Al-Obaidy, Khaleel
AU - Amin, Mahul
AU - Andreou, Georgios
AU - Barry, Marc
AU - Baydar, Dilek
AU - Bezerra, Stephania
AU - Bremmer, Felix
AU - Brugarolas, James
AU - Brunelli, Matteo
AU - Bubendorf, Lukas
AU - Buzacott, Katie
AU - Carlsen, Birgitte
AU - Chaux, Alcides
AU - Chen, Fei
AU - Choiniere, Roselyne
AU - Colecchia, Maurizio
AU - Collins, Katrina
AU - Comperat, Eva
AU - Contieri, Roberto
AU - Cookson, Michael
AU - Cubilla, Antonio
AU - Looijenga, Leendert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Working Group 1 at ISUP’s Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.
AB - Working Group 1 at ISUP’s Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.
KW - atypical intraductal proliferation
KW - consensus conference
KW - intraductal carcinoma
KW - precursor lesion
KW - prostate
KW - prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009104002
U2 - 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430
DO - 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430
M3 - Article
C2 - 40545966
AN - SCOPUS:105009104002
SN - 0147-5185
VL - 49
SP - e33-e45
JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology
IS - 12
ER -