Doorgaan naar hoofdnavigatie Doorgaan naar zoeken Ga verder naar hoofdinhoud

Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study

  • K. K.H. Goey
  • , S. G. Elias
  • , H. van Tinteren
  • , M. M. Laclé
  • , S. M. Willems
  • , G. J.A. Offerhaus
  • , W. W.J. de Leng
  • , E. Strengman
  • , A. J. ten Tije
  • , G. J.M. Creemers
  • , A. van der Velden
  • , F. E. de Jongh
  • , F. L.G. Erdkamp
  • , B. C. Tanis
  • , C. J.A. Punt
  • , Miriam Koopman

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftArtikelpeer review

70 Citaten (Scopus)

Samenvatting

Background: The phase 3 CAIRO3 study showed that capecitabine plus bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment after six cycles capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is effective, without compromising quality of life. In this post hoc analysis with updated follow-up and data regarding sidedness, we defined subgroups according to RAS/BRAF mutation status and mismatch repair (MMR) status, and investigated their influence on treatment efficacy. Patients and methods: A total of 558 patients with previously untreated mCRC and stable disease or better after six cycles CAPOX-B induction treatment were randomised to either CAP-B maintenance treatment (n=279) or observation (n=279). Upon first progression, patients were to receive CAPOX-B reintroduction until second progression (PFS2, primary end point). We centrally assessed RAS/BRAF mutation status and MMR status, or used local results if central assessment was not possible. Intention-to-treat stratified Cox models adjusted for baseline covariables were used to examine whether treatment efficacy was modified by RAS/BRAF mutation status. Results: RAS, BRAF mutations, and MMR deficiency were detected in 240/420 (58%), 36/381 (9%), and 4/279 (1%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 87 months (IQR 69-97), all mutational subgroups showed significant improvement from maintenance treatment for the primary end point PFS2 [RAS/BRAF wild-type: hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.84); RASmutant: HR 0.74 (0.55-0.98); V600EBRAF-mutant: HR 0.28 (0.12-0.64)] and secondary end points, except for the RAS-mutant subgroup regarding overall survival. Adjustment for sidedness instead of primary tumour location yielded comparable results. Although right-sided tumours were associated with inferior prognosis, both patients with right- and left-sided tumours showed significant benefit from maintenance treatment. Conclusions: CAP-B maintenance treatment after six cycles CAPOX-B is effective in first-line treatment of mCRC across all mutational subgroups. The benefit of maintenance treatment was most pronounced in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type and V600EBRAF-mutant tumours.

Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)2128-2134
Aantal pagina's7
TijdschriftAnnals of Oncology
Volume28
Nummer van het tijdschrift9
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - sep. 2017
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit