TY - JOUR
T1 - Making shared care work
T2 - A national qualitative case study on collaborative practice in pediatric oncology
AU - Dors, Natasja
AU - van Grotel, Martine
AU - Zijtregtop, Eline
AU - van der Salm, Nathalie
AU - Keukens, Laura
AU - Lavrijssen, Selma
AU - Drykoningen, Charlotte
AU - Poerink, Anne Jonge
AU - Thompson, Rod
AU - Homan, Jenneke
AU - Weismuller, Menco
AU - Nix, Wendy
AU - Blufpand, Hester
AU - van der Wey, Annemieke
AU - Martens, Daniëlle
AU - Hekkelaan, Marion
AU - Helder, Lotte
AU - Kollen, Wouter
AU - van Noesel, Max
AU - Hennus, Marije P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026
PY - 2026/6
Y1 - 2026/6
N2 - Background: In 2018, the Netherlands centralized all pediatric oncology care at the Prinses Máxima Center (Máxima), supported by a national network of 14 Shared Care centers. These centers deliver non-intensive treatment and supportive care closer to home, enabling a hybrid model of centralized expertise and regional accessibility. While structurally in place, little is known about how regional pediatricians experience this collaboration or which factors they consider essential to its success. Methods: This national qualitative multiple case study explored interprofessional collaboration between the Máxima and its Shared Care partners, from the perspective of pediatricians in all 14 regional centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using ATLAS.ti. Analysis was informed by Kaats & Opheij's collaboration framework, encompassing shared ambition, mutual interests, interpersonal relationships, structured collaboration, and meaningful processes. Peer debriefing was used to enhance trustworthiness and ensure clinical relevance. Results: Participants emphasized that close collaboration is indispensable for delivering safe, high-quality pediatric oncology care. Enabling factors included mutual trust, personal familiarity, timely and clear communication, and professional recognition. Challenges were identified in areas such as inconsistent policy implementation, opaque decision-making, and insufficient acknowledgment of local expertise. Many called for differentiated, context-sensitive care agreements rather than one-size-fits-all approaches. Conclusion: Effective shared care requires more than structural alignment: it demands investment in professional relationships, shared goals, and adaptive processes. These findings offer actionable insights to improve collaboration within the Dutch model and provide transferable lessons for other countries navigating centralized care in highcomplex, low-volume pediatric specialties.
AB - Background: In 2018, the Netherlands centralized all pediatric oncology care at the Prinses Máxima Center (Máxima), supported by a national network of 14 Shared Care centers. These centers deliver non-intensive treatment and supportive care closer to home, enabling a hybrid model of centralized expertise and regional accessibility. While structurally in place, little is known about how regional pediatricians experience this collaboration or which factors they consider essential to its success. Methods: This national qualitative multiple case study explored interprofessional collaboration between the Máxima and its Shared Care partners, from the perspective of pediatricians in all 14 regional centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using ATLAS.ti. Analysis was informed by Kaats & Opheij's collaboration framework, encompassing shared ambition, mutual interests, interpersonal relationships, structured collaboration, and meaningful processes. Peer debriefing was used to enhance trustworthiness and ensure clinical relevance. Results: Participants emphasized that close collaboration is indispensable for delivering safe, high-quality pediatric oncology care. Enabling factors included mutual trust, personal familiarity, timely and clear communication, and professional recognition. Challenges were identified in areas such as inconsistent policy implementation, opaque decision-making, and insufficient acknowledgment of local expertise. Many called for differentiated, context-sensitive care agreements rather than one-size-fits-all approaches. Conclusion: Effective shared care requires more than structural alignment: it demands investment in professional relationships, shared goals, and adaptive processes. These findings offer actionable insights to improve collaboration within the Dutch model and provide transferable lessons for other countries navigating centralized care in highcomplex, low-volume pediatric specialties.
KW - Centralized care
KW - Healthcare partnerships
KW - Network
KW - Pediatric oncology
KW - Physician perspective
KW - Qualitative study
KW - Regional collaboration
KW - Shared Care
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027969102
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/cc2d9bb9-67be-39e3-a9f3-0910c5999f93/
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100485
DO - 10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100485
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105027969102
SN - 2772-610X
VL - 7
JO - EJC Paediatric Oncology
JF - EJC Paediatric Oncology
M1 - 100485
ER -