TY - JOUR
T1 - Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English
AU - Kemps, Rachèl J.J.K.
AU - Wurm, Lee H.
AU - Ernestus, Mirjam
AU - Schreuder, Robert
AU - Baayen, Harald
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - Previous work has shown that Dutch listeners use prosodic information in the speech signal to optimise morphological processing: Listeners are sensitive to prosodic differences between a noun stem realised in isolation and a noun stem realised as part of a plural form (in which the stem is followed by an unstressed syllable). The present study, employing a lexical decision task, provides an additional demonstration of listeners' sensitivity to prosodic cues in the stem. This sensitivity is shown for two languages that differ in morphological productivity: Dutch and English. The degree of morphological productivity does not correlate with listeners' sensitivity to prosodic cues in the stem, but it is reflected in differential sensitivities to the word-specific log odds ratio of encountering an unshortened stem (i.e., a stem in isolation) versus encountering a shortened stem (i.e., a stem followed by a suffix consisting of one or more unstressed syllables). In addition to being sensitive to the prosodic cues themselves, listeners are also sensitive to the probabilities of occurrence of these prosodic cues. © 2005 Psychology Press Ltd.
AB - Previous work has shown that Dutch listeners use prosodic information in the speech signal to optimise morphological processing: Listeners are sensitive to prosodic differences between a noun stem realised in isolation and a noun stem realised as part of a plural form (in which the stem is followed by an unstressed syllable). The present study, employing a lexical decision task, provides an additional demonstration of listeners' sensitivity to prosodic cues in the stem. This sensitivity is shown for two languages that differ in morphological productivity: Dutch and English. The degree of morphological productivity does not correlate with listeners' sensitivity to prosodic cues in the stem, but it is reflected in differential sensitivities to the word-specific log odds ratio of encountering an unshortened stem (i.e., a stem in isolation) versus encountering a shortened stem (i.e., a stem followed by a suffix consisting of one or more unstressed syllables). In addition to being sensitive to the prosodic cues themselves, listeners are also sensitive to the probabilities of occurrence of these prosodic cues. © 2005 Psychology Press Ltd.
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/cd59979a-56ef-362e-ace0-1872e84b8d8c/
U2 - 10.1080/01690960444000223
DO - 10.1080/01690960444000223
M3 - Article
VL - 20
SP - 43
EP - 73
JO - Language and Cognitive Processes
JF - Language and Cognitive Processes
IS - 1-2
ER -