TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for psychosocial risk in Dutch families of a child with cancer
T2 - Reliability, validity, and usability of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool
AU - Sint Nicolaas, Simone M.
AU - Schepers, Sasja A.
AU - Hoogerbrugge, Peter M.
AU - Caron, Huib N.
AU - Kaspers, Gertjan J.L.
AU - Van Den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M.
AU - Grootenhuis, Martha A.
AU - Verhaak, Chris M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - Objective The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed to screen for psychosocial risk in families of a child diagnosed with cancer. The current study is the first describing the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity, and usability of the PAT in an European country (Dutch translation). Methods A total of 117 families (response rate 59%) of newly diagnosed children with cancer completed the PAT2.0 and validation measures. Results Acceptable reliability was obtained for the PAT total score (α=.72) and majority of subscales (0.50-0.82). Two subscales showed inadequate internal consistency (Social Support α=.19; Family Beliefs α=.20). Validity and usability were adequate. Of the families, 66% scored low (Universal), 29% medium (Targeted), and 5% high (Clinical) risk. Conclusions This study confirms the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, and validity of the PAT total score. Reliability left room for improvement on subscale level. Future research should indicate whether the PAT can be used to provide cost-effective care.
AB - Objective The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed to screen for psychosocial risk in families of a child diagnosed with cancer. The current study is the first describing the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity, and usability of the PAT in an European country (Dutch translation). Methods A total of 117 families (response rate 59%) of newly diagnosed children with cancer completed the PAT2.0 and validation measures. Results Acceptable reliability was obtained for the PAT total score (α=.72) and majority of subscales (0.50-0.82). Two subscales showed inadequate internal consistency (Social Support α=.19; Family Beliefs α=.20). Validity and usability were adequate. Of the families, 66% scored low (Universal), 29% medium (Targeted), and 5% high (Clinical) risk. Conclusions This study confirms the cross-cultural applicability, reliability, and validity of the PAT total score. Reliability left room for improvement on subscale level. Future research should indicate whether the PAT can be used to provide cost-effective care.
KW - Cancer and oncology
KW - Children
KW - Psychosocial functioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983799867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv119
DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv119
M3 - Article
C2 - 26715054
AN - SCOPUS:84983799867
SN - 0146-8693
VL - 41
SP - 810
EP - 819
JO - Journal of Pediatric Psychology
JF - Journal of Pediatric Psychology
IS - 7
ER -