TY - JOUR
T1 - Targeted therapies plus radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
T2 - the randomized phase 2 BIOMEDE trial
AU - Debily, Marie Anne
AU - Le Teuff, Gwenael
AU - Kergrohen, Thomas
AU - Varlet, Pascale
AU - Castel, David
AU - Leblond, Pierre
AU - Hargrave, Darren
AU - Nysom, Karsten
AU - Blomgren, Klas
AU - McCowage, Geoffrey Brian
AU - Bautista, Francisco
AU - van Vuurden, Dannis
AU - Jones, Chris
AU - Mackay, Alan
AU - Izquierdo, Elisa
AU - Ziegler, David S.
AU - Moussa, Angokai
AU - Barret, Emilie
AU - Puget, Stephanie
AU - Beccaria, Kevin
AU - Aquilina, Kristian
AU - Riffaud, Laurent
AU - Bolle, Stephanie
AU - Abbou, Samuel
AU - Bertozzi, Anne Isabelle
AU - De Carli, Emilie
AU - Boddaert, Nathalie
AU - Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia
AU - Calmon, Raphael
AU - Blanc, Patricia
AU - Vassal, Gilles
AU - Le Deley, Marie Cécile
AU - Grill, Jacques
N1 - © 2026. The Author(s).
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is the pediatric tumor with the worst prognosis. BIOMEDE was a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) (primary endpoint) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib, mTOR inhibitor everolimus and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with a biopsy-proven DIPG. Tumors were assessed centrally for immunohistochemical biomarkers (EGFR overexpression or PTEN loss) together with whole-exome and RNA sequencing. A cohort of 66 children with the same inclusion criteria and treated previously with temozolomide-based regimen was used to compare outcome. Treatment allocation was performed by randomization in 233 patients, designed so that a drug could not be allocated if the corresponding biomarker was absent: 36 received erlotinib, 102 received dasatinib and 95 received everolimus. The trial was ended for futility of the primary endpoint following the recommendations of the independent data monitoring committee: OS from biopsy was not different from the control cohort (median OS = 10.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.5−13.0)) in any of the three arms (median OS = 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.8−14.6) for erlotinib; 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.8−11.2) for dasatinib; and 11.9 months (95% CI: 10.7−14.2) for everolimus). Everolimus showed significantly less ocular, renal, skin and gastrointestinal side effects and treatment discontinuation for toxicity (secondary endpoint). TP53 mutations, frequently linked to multiple structural chromosomal aberrations, were the strongest predictor for poor survival in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 2.8 (95% CI: 1.9−4.2), P < 0.0001). Both mutations in and activation of the mTOR pathway were associated with a better response to everolimus. Four long-term survivors treated with an mTOR inhibitor were alive free of treatment over 6 years from diagnosis. With comprehensive tumor profiling, BIOMEDE validated prognostic biomarkers as well as informative theranostic biomarkers for future trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02233049.
AB - Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is the pediatric tumor with the worst prognosis. BIOMEDE was a randomized phase 2 trial comparing the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) (primary endpoint) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor erlotinib, mTOR inhibitor everolimus and multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in combination with radiotherapy in patients with a biopsy-proven DIPG. Tumors were assessed centrally for immunohistochemical biomarkers (EGFR overexpression or PTEN loss) together with whole-exome and RNA sequencing. A cohort of 66 children with the same inclusion criteria and treated previously with temozolomide-based regimen was used to compare outcome. Treatment allocation was performed by randomization in 233 patients, designed so that a drug could not be allocated if the corresponding biomarker was absent: 36 received erlotinib, 102 received dasatinib and 95 received everolimus. The trial was ended for futility of the primary endpoint following the recommendations of the independent data monitoring committee: OS from biopsy was not different from the control cohort (median OS = 10.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.5−13.0)) in any of the three arms (median OS = 9.7 months (95% CI: 7.8−14.6) for erlotinib; 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.8−11.2) for dasatinib; and 11.9 months (95% CI: 10.7−14.2) for everolimus). Everolimus showed significantly less ocular, renal, skin and gastrointestinal side effects and treatment discontinuation for toxicity (secondary endpoint). TP53 mutations, frequently linked to multiple structural chromosomal aberrations, were the strongest predictor for poor survival in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 2.8 (95% CI: 1.9−4.2), P < 0.0001). Both mutations in and activation of the mTOR pathway were associated with a better response to everolimus. Four long-term survivors treated with an mTOR inhibitor were alive free of treatment over 6 years from diagnosis. With comprehensive tumor profiling, BIOMEDE validated prognostic biomarkers as well as informative theranostic biomarkers for future trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02233049.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105037653086
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/06e04060-a3f3-37e6-b83b-a945e37be703/
U2 - 10.1038/s41591-026-04354-1
DO - 10.1038/s41591-026-04354-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 42032072
AN - SCOPUS:105037653086
SN - 1078-8956
VL - 32
SP - 2201
EP - 2215
JO - Nature medicine
JF - Nature medicine
IS - 6
ER -