TY - JOUR
T1 - The Dutch chaos case
T2 - A scoping review of knowledge and decision support tools available to clinicians in the Netherlands
AU - Dreesens, Dunja
AU - Kremer, Leontien
AU - van der Weijden, Trudy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Background: To keep clinicians up-to-date with the latest evidence, clinical practice and patient preferences, more and more knowledge tools – aiming to synthesise knowledge and support (shared) decision-making – are being developed. Unfortunately, it seems that in the Netherlands, and possibly elsewhere, the amount of different knowledge tool types makes it difficult to see the forest through the trees. Methods: A scoping review, exploring types of knowledge tools available to Dutch clinicians (and patients) and how these tools are described. The search terms were collected from thesauri and textbooks, and used to search the websites and documents of selected national tool developing organisations. Results: The review yielded 126 tool types. We included 67 different tool types, such as guidelines, protocols, standards and clinical pathways. Half of those tool types were aimed at clinicians, 14 at patients and 18 at both. In general, descriptions of the tool types were hard to find or incomplete. Conclusions: There exists a myriad of knowledge tool types and their descriptions are mostly unclear. The information overload experienced by clinicians is not addressed effectively by developing numerous unclearly defined knowledge tools. We recommend limiting the number of tool types and making a greater effort in clearly defining them. This abundance of poorly defined tools does not seem to be restricted to the Netherlands.
AB - Background: To keep clinicians up-to-date with the latest evidence, clinical practice and patient preferences, more and more knowledge tools – aiming to synthesise knowledge and support (shared) decision-making – are being developed. Unfortunately, it seems that in the Netherlands, and possibly elsewhere, the amount of different knowledge tool types makes it difficult to see the forest through the trees. Methods: A scoping review, exploring types of knowledge tools available to Dutch clinicians (and patients) and how these tools are described. The search terms were collected from thesauri and textbooks, and used to search the websites and documents of selected national tool developing organisations. Results: The review yielded 126 tool types. We included 67 different tool types, such as guidelines, protocols, standards and clinical pathways. Half of those tool types were aimed at clinicians, 14 at patients and 18 at both. In general, descriptions of the tool types were hard to find or incomplete. Conclusions: There exists a myriad of knowledge tool types and their descriptions are mostly unclear. The information overload experienced by clinicians is not addressed effectively by developing numerous unclearly defined knowledge tools. We recommend limiting the number of tool types and making a greater effort in clearly defining them. This abundance of poorly defined tools does not seem to be restricted to the Netherlands.
KW - (Shared) decision-making
KW - Definitions
KW - Guidelines
KW - Knowledge
KW - Review
KW - Tools
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075214140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.10.001
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.10.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 31722782
AN - SCOPUS:85075214140
SN - 0168-8510
VL - 123
SP - 1288
EP - 1297
JO - Health Policy
JF - Health Policy
IS - 12
ER -