TY - JOUR
T1 - Three Rounds of External Quality Assessment in France to Evaluate the Performance of 28 Platforms for Multiparametric Molecular Testing in Metastatic Colorectal and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
AU - Dequeker, Elisabeth M.C.
AU - Keppens, Cleo
AU - Egele, Caroline
AU - Delen, Sofie
AU - Lamy, Aude
AU - Lemoine, Antoinette
AU - Sabourin, Jean Christophe
AU - Andrieu, Catherine
AU - Ligtenberg, Marjolijn
AU - Fetique, Dominique
AU - Tops, Bastiaan
AU - Descarpentries, Clotilde
AU - Blons, Hélène
AU - Denoux, Yves
AU - Aube, Cécile
AU - Penault-Llorca, Frederique
AU - Hofman, Paul
AU - Leroy, Karen
AU - Le Marechal, Cédric
AU - Doucet, Laurent
AU - Duranton-Tanneur, Valérie
AU - Pedeutour, Florence
AU - Soubeyran, Isabelle
AU - Côté, Jean François
AU - Emile, Jean François
AU - Vignaud, Jean Michel
AU - Monhoven, Nathalie
AU - Haddad, Véronique
AU - Laurent-Puig, Pierre
AU - Van Krieken, Han
AU - Nowak, Frederique
AU - Lonchamp, Etienne
AU - Bellocq, Jean Pierre
AU - Rouleau, Etienne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Personalized medicine has gained increasing importance in clinical oncology, and several clinically important biomarkers are implemented in routine practice. In an effort to guarantee high quality of molecular testing in France, three subsequent external quality assessment rounds were organized at the initiative of the National Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2014. The schemes included clinically relevant biomarkers for metastatic colorectal (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, microsatellite instability) and non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2), and they represent the first multigene/multicancer studies throughout Europe. In total, 56 laboratories coordinated by 28 regional molecular centers participated in the schemes. Laboratories received formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples and were asked to use routine methods for molecular testing to predict patient response to targeted therapies. They were encouraged to return results within 14 calendar days after sample receipt. Both genotyping and reporting were evaluated separately. During the three external quality assessment rounds, mean genotype scores were all above the preset standard of 90% for all biomarkers. Participants were mainly challenged in case of rare insertions or deletions. Assessment of the written reports showed substantial progress between the external quality assessment schemes on multiple criteria. Several essential elements such as the clinical interpretation of test results and the reason for testing still require improvement by continued external quality assessment education.
AB - Personalized medicine has gained increasing importance in clinical oncology, and several clinically important biomarkers are implemented in routine practice. In an effort to guarantee high quality of molecular testing in France, three subsequent external quality assessment rounds were organized at the initiative of the National Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2014. The schemes included clinically relevant biomarkers for metastatic colorectal (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, microsatellite instability) and non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2), and they represent the first multigene/multicancer studies throughout Europe. In total, 56 laboratories coordinated by 28 regional molecular centers participated in the schemes. Laboratories received formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples and were asked to use routine methods for molecular testing to predict patient response to targeted therapies. They were encouraged to return results within 14 calendar days after sample receipt. Both genotyping and reporting were evaluated separately. During the three external quality assessment rounds, mean genotype scores were all above the preset standard of 90% for all biomarkers. Participants were mainly challenged in case of rare insertions or deletions. Assessment of the written reports showed substantial progress between the external quality assessment schemes on multiple criteria. Several essential elements such as the clinical interpretation of test results and the reason for testing still require improvement by continued external quality assessment education.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960943529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.09.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 26752307
AN - SCOPUS:84960943529
SN - 1525-1578
VL - 18
SP - 205
EP - 214
JO - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
IS - 2
ER -