TY - JOUR
T1 - What needs to be standardized for reliable, reproducible, and robust tractography?
AU - Legarreta, Jon Haitz
AU - Schiavi, Simona
AU - Tang, Wei
AU - Banks, Garrett
AU - Cieslak, Matthew
AU - Schilling, Kurt
AU - De Luca, Alberto
AU - Tournier, Jacques Donald
AU - Kruper, John
AU - Rheault, Francois
AU - Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
AU - Pestilli, Franco
AU - Veraart, Jelle
AU - Yang, Joseph Yuan Mou
AU - Descoteaux, Maxime
AU - Heilbronner, Sarah
AU - Rokem, Ariel
N1 - © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of GigaScience.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Tractography is a key component of efforts to map brain connectivity. As a rapidly evolving field of neuroscience, current tractography methods are diverse, often varying across research laboratories and different software pipelines. Therefore, it suffers from a lack of standardization, leading to inconsistencies in results, which can limit reproducibility and affect the robustness needed for research and clinical applications of these methods. Variability in data acquisition procedures, inconsistencies in spatial referencing schemes and implementations, and anatomical heterogeneity—at the individual level, across the lifespan, and across species—hinder comparative analyses. Additionally, the lack of consensus on best practices complicates the development of robust automated quality control pipelines and limits the clinical translation of tractography-based procedures. Establishing standardized protocols for acquisition, preprocessing, and tractography reconstruction is critical toward enabling reliable tract-specific analyses, facilitating cross-study harmonization, and supporting replicable large-scale population studies. The present article provides an overview of the current challenges in tractography standardization and identifies the key aspects that require standardization for reliable, reproducible, and robust tractography.
AB - Tractography is a key component of efforts to map brain connectivity. As a rapidly evolving field of neuroscience, current tractography methods are diverse, often varying across research laboratories and different software pipelines. Therefore, it suffers from a lack of standardization, leading to inconsistencies in results, which can limit reproducibility and affect the robustness needed for research and clinical applications of these methods. Variability in data acquisition procedures, inconsistencies in spatial referencing schemes and implementations, and anatomical heterogeneity—at the individual level, across the lifespan, and across species—hinder comparative analyses. Additionally, the lack of consensus on best practices complicates the development of robust automated quality control pipelines and limits the clinical translation of tractography-based procedures. Establishing standardized protocols for acquisition, preprocessing, and tractography reconstruction is critical toward enabling reliable tract-specific analyses, facilitating cross-study harmonization, and supporting replicable large-scale population studies. The present article provides an overview of the current challenges in tractography standardization and identifies the key aspects that require standardization for reliable, reproducible, and robust tractography.
KW - brain connectivity
KW - computational neuroimaging
KW - neuroanatomy
KW - standardization
KW - tractography
KW - white matter
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Humans
KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards
KW - Brain/diagnostic imaging
KW - Animals
KW - Software
KW - Diffusion Tensor Imaging/standards
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105037811549
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/b00b0d52-1ac7-378b-a64b-c627345bb3e5/
U2 - 10.1093/gigascience/giag034
DO - 10.1093/gigascience/giag034
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41880537
AN - SCOPUS:105037811549
SN - 2047-217X
VL - 15
JO - GigaScience
JF - GigaScience
ER -